Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63397
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Python 3 Q & A (Nick C.) updated |
| Date | 2014-01-06 21:07 -0500 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5107.1389060440.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
As a counterpoint to 2 versus 3: http://python-notes.curiousefficiency.org/en/latest/python3/questions_and_answers.html by Nick Coughlan, one of Python's major core developers. A couple of points related to the other threads. 1. There were real social and technical reasons for the non-2.8 pep (404). 2. Python 3 is a work in progress with respect to the new text model. In particular wire protocol programming is a known problem area and will get attention. But it is only a small part of the total Python universe. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python 3 Q & A (Nick C.) updated Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-06 21:07 -0500
csiph-web