Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63375
| References | (1 earlier) <labmaj$8u2$1@ger.gmane.org> <lad05k$gf6$1@ger.gmane.org> <loom.20140106T171406-519@post.gmane.org> <52CB3403.3000903@udel.edu> <loom.20140107T000537-394@post.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-07 10:24 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5093.1389050680.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > Terry Reedy <tjreedy <at> udel.edu> writes: >> >> On 1/6/2014 11:29 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >> > People don't use? According to available figures, there are more > downloads of >> > Python 3 than downloads of Python 2 (Windows installers, mostly): >> > http://www.python.org/webstats/ >> >> While I would like the claim to be true, I do not see 2 versus 3 >> downloads on that page. Did you mean another link? > > Just click on a recent month, scroll down to the "Total URLs By kB" > table, and compute the sum of the largest numbers for each Python > version. Here's what I see there (expanding on what I said in the other post, which was based on one table further up, URLs by hit count) for December: 3.3.3: 1214571 - amd64 627672 - win32 586899 2.7.6: 1049096 - win32 607972 - amd64 441124 The next highest number is 167K downloads, so I'm going to ignore their figures as they won't make more than 15% difference in these stats. This is 2263667 total downloads of the current versions of Python, 46% 2.7.6 and 54% 3.3.3. That's not incredibly significant statistically, but certainly it disproves the notion that 3.x isn't used at all. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 10:24 +1100
csiph-web