Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63373
| References | (1 earlier) <labmaj$8u2$1@ger.gmane.org> <lad05k$gf6$1@ger.gmane.org> <loom.20140106T171406-519@post.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmoNowZXLq=Nc6LokH3XJDFAhgjozJRP6u4eMYO2POgqaw@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20140106T212947-569@post.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-07 10:15 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5091.1389050133.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > Chris Angelico <rosuav <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis <at> pitrou.net> > wrote: >> > People don't use? According to available figures, there are more > downloads of >> > Python 3 than downloads of Python 2 (Windows installers, mostly): >> > http://www.python.org/webstats/ >> > >> >> Unfortunately, that has a massive inherent bias, because there are >> Python builds available in most Linux distributions - and stats from >> those (like Debian's popcon) will be nearly as useless, because a lot >> of them will install one or the other (probably 2.x) without waiting >> for the user (so either they'll skew in favour of the one installed, >> or in favour of the one NOT installed, because that's the only one >> that'll be explicitly requested). It's probably fairly accurate for >> Windows stats, though, since most people who want Python on Windows >> are going to come to python.org for an installer. > > Agreed, but it's enough to rebut the claim that "people don't use > Python 3". More than one million Python 3.3 downloads per month under > Windows is a very respectable number (no 2.x release seems to reach > that level). Sure. The absolute number is useful; I just don't think the relative number is - you started by talking about there being "more downloads of Python 3 than downloads of Python 2", and it's that comparison that I think is unfair. But the absolute numbers are definitely significant. I'm not quite sure how to interpret the non-link lines in [1] but I see the month of December showing roughly 1.2 million Python 3.3.3 downloads for Windows - interestingly, split almost fifty-fifty between 64-bit and 32-bit installs - and just over one million Python 2.7.6 installs. That's one month, two million installations of Python. That's 73,021 *per day* for the month of December. That is a lot of Python. ChrisA [1] http://www.python.org/webstats/usage_201312.html#TOPURLS
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 10:15 +1100
csiph-web