Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'explicitly': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; '(so': 0.07; '64-bit': 0.07; '32-bit': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'windows': 0.15; '(windows': 0.16; 'agreed,': 0.16; 'antoine': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'stats': 0.16; 'subject:More': 0.16; 'subject:Unicode': 0.16; 'sure.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'split': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'install': 0.23; '2.x': 0.24; 'interpret': 0.24; 'month,': 0.24; 'fairly': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'nearly': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; '[1]': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; '(like': 0.30; 'absolute': 0.30; 'relative': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'lines': 0.31; 'comparison': 0.31; 'subject:About': 0.31; "they'll": 0.31; 'use?': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'python.org': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'linux': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'december': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'massive': 0.38; 'though,': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'according': 0.40; 'release': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'subject:"': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'reach': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'talking': 0.65; 'between': 0.67; 'million': 0.74; '(probably': 0.84; 'inherent': 0.84; 'respectable': 0.84; 'favour': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=9gdxzzaNMAUbS9sBvbyH0p+9gqmYdczYz4J1y7gj0y0=; b=X0EqGi5ZnVSQaHGuRKTsEWfh8pD0piMPms3K6yGhUrFylHo/m8Qx/GrHeTvrDP+AG9 QfmeeUaZIgw9p2+NeLGQ2lxLbjZJCe6+5+ejBy09Gf7O/3mssJkdAtzDbF8nlTTwP5KM zAkjCxpMURyemlR99eMwrAV5zZZYqs/RXgt0mXI3o7bQWZrVE66yO/7OTijiS29WG/1W jpBLf6v6KcAkLYJ+zaWc1NS3vs3EEMJekWyQKm8S/m+Zo3jfmt54KjC0LhrrYP9lo3mL eJYV4h31gcH2qFsxVIOYGbrPlv3u/jcUao3ovJ5hAkbhcRyVTVHLVgWNQmM4ZIeGQrFa jnNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.162.66 with SMTP id xy2mr10633289pbb.46.1389050123304; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:15:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:15:23 +1100 Subject: Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 41 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1389050133 news.xs4all.nl 2953 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46980 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:63373 On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Chris Angelico gmail.com> writes: >> >> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Antoine Pitrou pitrou.net> > wrote: >> > People don't use? According to available figures, there are more > downloads of >> > Python 3 than downloads of Python 2 (Windows installers, mostly): >> > http://www.python.org/webstats/ >> > >> >> Unfortunately, that has a massive inherent bias, because there are >> Python builds available in most Linux distributions - and stats from >> those (like Debian's popcon) will be nearly as useless, because a lot >> of them will install one or the other (probably 2.x) without waiting >> for the user (so either they'll skew in favour of the one installed, >> or in favour of the one NOT installed, because that's the only one >> that'll be explicitly requested). It's probably fairly accurate for >> Windows stats, though, since most people who want Python on Windows >> are going to come to python.org for an installer. > > Agreed, but it's enough to rebut the claim that "people don't use > Python 3". More than one million Python 3.3 downloads per month under > Windows is a very respectable number (no 2.x release seems to reach > that level). Sure. The absolute number is useful; I just don't think the relative number is - you started by talking about there being "more downloads of Python 3 than downloads of Python 2", and it's that comparison that I think is unfair. But the absolute numbers are definitely significant. I'm not quite sure how to interpret the non-link lines in [1] but I see the month of December showing roughly 1.2 million Python 3.3.3 downloads for Windows - interestingly, split almost fifty-fifty between 64-bit and 32-bit installs - and just over one million Python 2.7.6 installs. That's one month, two million installations of Python. That's 73,021 *per day* for the month of December. That is a lot of Python. ChrisA [1] http://www.python.org/webstats/usage_201312.html#TOPURLS