Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #12328
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <johnmohagan@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.045 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'thread,': 0.04; '"default': 0.09; 'function:': 0.09; 'examples': 0.11; 'def': 0.15; '"f"': 0.16; '"n"': 0.16; 'closures,': 0.16; 'expression,': 0.16; 'this:': 0.16; 'seems': 0.20; 'tells': 0.21; 'refers': 0.23; 'explains': 0.24; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.25; 'preferred': 0.25; "i'm": 0.27; 'function': 0.27; 'bound': 0.29; 'definition': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'least': 0.31; 'values': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; "i've": 0.34; 'surprised': 0.34; 'google': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'question': 0.36; 'using': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'somewhat': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'ways': 0.39; 'header:Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'header :Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'john': 0.62; 'factory': 0.73; 'subject:this': 0.74; 'right),': 0.84; 'surprised,': 0.84; 'time"': 0.84; 'received:home': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7ZzMqgoVMi+pMTBLh/yAcp0WkBOQ3j0+VsvyxOHVVhg=; b=cOf1eafbCZPBtLhOBJ0l9yqJaTtoV4vlEQdIaHfSwDAItY3djOrKlnFdv/Lke34qid NbWIhlog1eLy0NkZiJCW9Wo1eQoTqu5OGyKSPPnEpemD7yuIFGJnOCqyUQ6/v3skywbZ oiGTTAf08s/Cdcd4Hu+onTAvY87EN2aOFWsV4= |
| Sender | "John O'Hagan" <johnmohagan@gmail.com> |
| Date | Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:45:05 +1000 |
| From | John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Why do closures do this? |
| X-Mailer | Sylpheed 3.2.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.500.1314503122.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 36 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1314503122 news.xs4all.nl 2438 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55968 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:12328 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Somewhat apropos of the recent "function principle" thread, I was recently surprised by this:
funcs=[]
for n in range(3):
def f():
return n
funcs.append(f)
[i() for i in funcs]
The last expression, IMO surprisingly, is [2,2,2], not [0,1,2]. Google tells me I'm not the only one surprised, but explains that it's because "n" in the function "f" refers to whatever "n" is currently bound to, not what it was bound to at definition time (if I've got that right), and that there are at least two ways around it: either make a factory function:
def mkfnc(n):
def fnc():
return n
return fnc
funcs=[]
for n in range(3):
funcs.append(mkfnc(n))
which seems roundabout, or take advantage of the "default values set at definition time" behaviour:
funcs=[]
for n in range(3):
def f(n=n):
return n
funcs.append(f)
which seems obscure, and a side-effect.
My question is, is this an inescapable consequence of using closures, or is it by design, and if so, what are some examples of where this would be the preferred behaviour?
Regards,
John
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why do closures do this? John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2011-08-28 13:45 +1000 Re: Why do closures do this? Carl Banks <pavlovevidence@gmail.com> - 2011-08-28 14:16 -0700 Re: Why do closures do this? Carl Banks <pavlovevidence@gmail.com> - 2011-08-28 14:16 -0700
csiph-web