Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #109502

Re: Operator precedence problem

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Operator precedence problem
Date Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:35:44 +0200
Organization None
Lines 36
Message-ID <mailman.5.1465112166.2306.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com> <nj0kol$ps$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7Bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de 9mRqS9NkmiGOw0N61YxvUADQOmMXZQ+2x5oI7EGACXvA==
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; '"""': 0.05; 'python3': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.13; 'bitwise': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'unary': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'skip:{ 20': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; 'subject:problem': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'arithmetic': 0.29; 'cat': 0.29; 'other,': 0.29; 'skip:_ 10': 0.32; 'class': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'url:org': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'url:3': 0.60; 'power': 0.72; 'special': 0.73; '3))': 0.84; '512': 0.84; 'ict': 0.84; 'self.value': 0.84; 'url:reference': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host p57bd9cdd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
User-Agent KNode/4.13.3
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <nj0kol$ps$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:109502

Show key headers only | View raw

ICT Ezy wrote:

>>>> 2 ** 3 ** 2
> Answer is 512
> Why not 64?
> Order is right-left or left-right?

** is a special case:

"""
The power operator ** binds less tightly than an arithmetic or bitwise unary 
operator on its right, that is, 2**-1 is 0.5.
"""
https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/expressions.html#id21

Here's a little demo:

$ cat arithdemo.py
class A:
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value = str(value)
    def __add__(self, other):
        return self._op(other, "+")
    def __pow__(self, other):
        return self._op(other, "**")
    def __repr__(self):
        return self.value
    def _op(self, other, op):
        return A("({} {} {})".format(self.value, op, other.value))
$ python3 -i arithdemo.py 
>>> A(1) + A(2) + A(3)
((1 + 2) + 3)
>>> A(1) ** A(2) ** A(3)
(1 ** (2 ** 3))

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 23:53 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-05 09:35 +0200
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 08:05 -0700
      Re: Operator precedence problem Uri Even-Chen <uri@speedy.net> - 2016-06-05 19:05 +0300
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:24 -0700
        Re: Operator precedence problem Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 22:46 -0700
          Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:57 -0400
            Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:22 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:35 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:55 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:03 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 18:22 +0300
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:27 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 01:57 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 16:05 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:21 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 17:02 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 16:51 +0000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-06 18:38 +0200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-07 03:07 +1000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 14:44 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 21:49 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-06-06 20:17 +0100
                Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:27 +1200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:14 -0700
              Re: Operator precedence problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-06 21:09 +0100
      Re: Operator precedence problem Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 17:47 -0600
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 02:24 +1000
    Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-06-06 16:58 +0000
      Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:21 +1200
  Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-05 13:19 -0400
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2016-06-05 00:04 -0700

csiph-web