Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #109568
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Operator precedence problem |
| Date | 2016-06-06 10:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.38.1465223750.2306.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <2a577a90-3a39-4d8f-90fa-4a00fd4f06a3@googlegroups.com> <1465221421.1069788.629246361.60094337@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.37.1465221424.2306.python-list@python.org> <87inxmmm67.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <1465223747.1077208.629311025.666B5AF8@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016, at 10:22, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > You *can* assume other people have read the spec. Even more importantly, > you can assume the Python interpreter complies with the spec. I can assume the python interpreter will accept tabs as indents too, that doesn't make it good style. Requiring people to constantly flip between my code and the language reference to understand it is also not good style.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 23:53 -0700
Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-05 09:35 +0200
Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 08:05 -0700
Re: Operator precedence problem Uri Even-Chen <uri@speedy.net> - 2016-06-05 19:05 +0300
Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:24 -0700
Re: Operator precedence problem Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 22:46 -0700
Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:57 -0400
Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:22 +0300
Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:35 -0400
Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:55 +0300
Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:03 +0000
Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 18:22 +0300
Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:27 +0000
Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 01:57 +1000
Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 16:05 +0000
Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:21 +1000
Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 17:02 +0000
Re: Operator precedence problem Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 16:51 +0000
Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-06 18:38 +0200
Re: Operator precedence problem Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-07 03:07 +1000
Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 14:44 -0400
Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 21:49 +0300
Re: Operator precedence problem MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-06-06 20:17 +0100
Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:27 +1200
Re: Operator precedence problem Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:14 -0700
Re: Operator precedence problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-06 21:09 +0100
Re: Operator precedence problem Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 17:47 -0600
Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 02:24 +1000
Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-06-06 16:58 +0000
Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:21 +1200
Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-05 13:19 -0400
Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
Re: Operator precedence problem Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2016-06-05 00:04 -0700
csiph-web