Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #53473
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.etla.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.016 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'received:134': 0.05; 'clause': 0.09; 'parsed': 0.09; 'worse': 0.09; '10:45': 0.16; 'clause.': 0.16; 'clauses': 0.16; 'construct.': 0.16; 'for,': 0.16; 'indent': 0.16; 'programmer,': 0.16; 'subject:python': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'seems': 0.21; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "shouldn't": 0.24; 'together.': 0.24; "haven't": 0.24; 'this:': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'lines': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'subject:end': 0.31; 'done.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; "didn't": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'saves': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'chain': 0.60; 'become': 0.64; 'risk': 0.72; 'obvious': 0.74; 'ambiguous': 0.84; 'cost,': 0.84; 'nonsense.': 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84; 'hand,': 0.93 |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered | true |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result | Ap8EAFFuJFKGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABawgCDAoE5gxgBAQUyAUURCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgCh36wRYhvkAYWhAcDl3WGGItOgyI |
| Date | Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:58:23 +0200 |
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: semicolon at end of python's statements |
| References | <1377735506.18906.15.camel@debian> <mailman.347.1377760274.19984.python-list@python.org> <1FETt.52607$Mw4.14965@fx15.am4> <CAPTjJmpBbf=BkZdeg3VdBYFvB0ADtyseGAMB214jJDyqZa=pmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=1kxR_pT=MsUSSk0v-oij-0hSh0LEYrrP5i+5MukmcYfOGWA@mail.gmail.com> <7wob8gywds.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.385.1377858745.19984.python-list@python.org> <52213435$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.458.1378068912.19984.python-list@python.org> <522446ae$0$2743$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <52245E2F.4020909@rece.vub.ac.be> <52246BAD.9050403@gmail.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <52246BAD.9050403@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.482.1378119505.19984.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 38 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1378119505 news.xs4all.nl 16010 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51806 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:53473 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Op 02-09-13 12:42, Fábio Santos schreef: > On 09/02/2013 10:45 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote: >> Op 02-09-13 10:05, Steven D'Aprano schreef: >>> It doesn't keep a whole chain of >>> if clauses together. It doesn't let you do anything that you haven't >>> already done. It just saves an indent and a newline. The cost, on the >>> other hand, includes the risk that people will try to do this: >>> >>> for item in seq: if cond: >>> do_this() >>> do_that() >>> else: >>> do_something else() >>> >>> which is clearly nonsense. Worse is this: >>> >>> for item in seq: if cond: >>> do_this() >>> do_that() >>> else: >>> do_something else() >>> >>> which is still nonsense but won't raise SyntaxError. >> Why shouldn't this raise a SyntaxError? >> > Because it would be parsed as a valid for .. else construct. Either that > or become ambiguous to the programmer, who would not be sure whether he > was writing an else clause for the `if`, or for the `for`. I didn't thought about that, but in that case why should we automatically think of it as nonsense? I also don't see how this would be that ambigous. The else lines up with the for, so it seems rather obvious for which he was writing an else clause. -- Antoon Pardon
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com> - 2013-08-28 22:10 -0400
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2013-08-29 09:39 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-29 19:52 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-08-29 11:02 +0100
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-30 08:17 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-30 08:50 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-30 14:55 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-08-30 09:15 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-30 17:25 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-08-30 09:48 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-08-30 11:32 +0100
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-08-30 06:53 -0400
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-08-30 16:14 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-31 08:18 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-08-31 00:09 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-31 01:03 -0400
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-08-31 10:47 +0300
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2013-08-31 09:00 +0100
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-08-31 13:28 +0300
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-09-02 14:20 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-09-02 09:45 -0500
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-09-02 10:47 -0400
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-09-02 12:58 -0500
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-09-03 07:07 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-01 19:58 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-01 21:58 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-09-02 08:05 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-02 11:45 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 11:42 +0100
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-02 12:58 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements "albert visser" <albert.visser@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 19:44 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-09-02 13:53 -0400
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-09-03 17:15 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-09-03 20:00 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-09-02 17:24 -0400
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-09-02 00:30 +0100
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-02 10:29 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-09-02 09:52 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 20:14 +1000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-09-02 14:57 +0000
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-02 12:52 +0200
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Modulok <modulok@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 17:17 -0600
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-09-02 19:54 -0400
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Modulok <modulok@gmail.com> - 2013-09-02 18:56 -0600
csiph-web