Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8541
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.007 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'arguments': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'decorator': 0.09; 'naturally': 0.09; 'not?': 0.09; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'parentheses': 0.16; 'argument': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; '(i.e.': 0.17; 'cheers,': 0.19; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'optional': 0.23; 'tue,': 0.23; 'work.': 0.28; 'concern': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'decorators': 0.30; 'least': 0.31; 'people,': 0.33; 'instead': 0.34; 'normally': 0.34; 'all.': 0.35; 'skip:@ 10': 0.35; 'guys': 0.36; 'certain': 0.36; 'explain': 0.36; 'some': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85.161': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'either': 0.39; 'subject:with': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'views': 0.40; 'advantages': 0.77; '10:52': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=I83f2PLp4Nd7vtPnm7IdY+hYgPFnNdLh4eCKIHA73Ao=; b=vHFRtx58t5TkJvVag1kgcjMD9EIiJz3FZ4K2Q5ZJEnzK06WPGD4zUV3Xg39tM8yWdC jjOsIJ45cxEDvh39pGx3PodDt/JbjTemhUCbisLwSO95HoL0OnE6tLM3L6lkGhDKMOcj d1yUfvzZv1zTa64lTY1EIugEAGjTto+dkjSa8= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <d35e1e82-410b-471b-a3c7-379c1822adb0@m22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
| References | <d35e1e82-410b-471b-a3c7-379c1822adb0@m22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:20:29 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Using decorators with argument in Python |
| To | Jigar Tanna <poisonousrattle5@gmail.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.482.1309281662.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 25 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1309281662 news6.xs4all.nl 4354 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57891 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8541 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Jigar Tanna <poisonousrattle5@gmail.com> wrote: > coming across to certain views from people, it is not a good practice > to use > decorators with arguments (i.e. @memoize() ) and instead it is good to > just > use @memoize. Can any of you guys explain me advantages and > disadvantages of > using each of them The main concern I think is not with how the decorators are used but how they are designed. An argument-less decorator will normally be used as @memoize, and @memoize() will likely not work. A decorator with arguments that are all optional will normally be used as @memoize(), and @memoize will likely not work. This naturally leads to some confusion: do I need parentheses to use this particular decorator or not? As a personal design goal I try to make my decorators either take at least one required argument or take no arguments at all. This way it's either @memoize or @memoize(foo), but never just the confusing @memoize(). Cheers, Ian
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using decorators with argument in Python Jigar Tanna <poisonousrattle5@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 09:52 -0700
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 03:06 +1000
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python John Posner <jjposner@codicesoftware.com> - 2011-06-29 13:23 -0400
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-29 12:30 -0700
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 13:29 -0600
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-29 14:29 -0700
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-29 15:26 -0600
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-06-29 14:51 -0700
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-06-30 09:00 +0000
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python John Posner <jjposner@codicesoftware.com> - 2011-07-01 11:18 -0400
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-28 11:20 -0600
Re: Using decorators with argument in Python Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-06-29 08:19 +1000
csiph-web