Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #93775

Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index()

References <mo0qk1$ora$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.475.1436843580.3674.python-list@python.org> <55a480c0$0$1673$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2015-07-13 22:07 -0600
Subject Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index()
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.477.1436846888.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 01:12 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Quick question: why does str have both index() and find(), while list
>>> only has index()? Is there a reason for that, or is it just an historical
>>> accident?
>>
>> Historical accident, I think. If it were to be redone, I doubt that
>> str.find would exist. The problem with it is that it returns -1 to
>> indicate that the argument was not found, but -1 is a valid index into
>> the string. This is a potential source of hard-to-find bugs.
>
> Correct. But rather than removing it, it would be better to take a leaf out
> of re.match's book and return None as the sentinel. That would eliminate
> the "using -1 as a valid index" bug.

I disagree on both counts.

>>> s = 'abc'
>>> s[None:None]
'abc'

Better IMO to just have the one non-redundant method that raises an
exception rather than returning anything that could possibly be
interpreted as a string index.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 21:12 -0600
  Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index() Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-14 13:23 +1000
    Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index() Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 22:07 -0600
      Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index() Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-14 14:58 +1000
        Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index() Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:13 +1000

csiph-web