Return-Path: <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'string.': 0.04; 'bug.': 0.07; 'correct.': 0.07; 'interpreted': 0.07; 'raises': 0.07; 'exist.': 0.09; 'subject:()': 0.09; 'exception': 0.13; 'index': 0.13; 'argument': 0.15; '"using': 0.16; 'bugs.': 0.16; 'index.': 0.16; 'subject:versus': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'found,': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; '13,': 0.29; 'question:': 0.29; 'str': 0.29; 'possibly': 0.32; 'problem': 0.33; 'source': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'doubt': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'tue,': 0.34; 'that,': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'returning': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'method': 0.37; 'anything': 0.38; 'hi,': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'rather': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'skip:n 10': 0.62; 'jul': 0.72; 'to:name:python': 0.84
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=cElryH7fW/o51IWLHPEDdCrZpsj0XMdJV1yZn/wr4/o=; b=H18Nj+FCZgtc308Kq5eTDmpVhBZsTxciEgzc8qL2I9ZOriJQAEaH3oS2rPPTryxIn+ Ctn8O60SF2U9dI2vQm7dpMPwDHIM0eK/r6cSTAfSeuTfMVcnB2BUbb/HGnG+nmXAup5K yFemfHA6CWKZudOTRfkSEoaj0nkB3qKDUKKY7iLVpI1nzjhXE2F5iKSwKAAXbbHmu5M3 2WY7gFE6I2E2qyvZBO2Q2b+di06YGOrKolaJ4/r0/kLKPZ1ByVcT3cbAPEtrodhX3JAC wCsKXfO+zGYrchu9sev9O0rjqW+onyOgmSrM8hG1M44K5rCmEotW08JBuj5qoV8oF5+G PgEQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.88.86 with SMTP id m83mr15385871ywb.147.1436846886390; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55a480c0$0$1673$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References: <mo0qk1$ora$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.475.1436843580.3674.python-list@python.org> <55a480c0$0$1673$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
From: Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:07:27 -0600
Subject: Re: str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index()
To: Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.477.1436846888.3674.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1436846888 news.xs4all.nl 2874 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51348
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:93775

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 01:12 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Quick question: why does str have both index() and find(), while list
>>> only has index()? Is there a reason for that, or is it just an historical
>>> accident?
>>
>> Historical accident, I think. If it were to be redone, I doubt that
>> str.find would exist. The problem with it is that it returns -1 to
>> indicate that the argument was not found, but -1 is a valid index into
>> the string. This is a potential source of hard-to-find bugs.
>
> Correct. But rather than removing it, it would be better to take a leaf out
> of re.match's book and return None as the sentinel. That would eliminate
> the "using -1 as a valid index" bug.

I disagree on both counts.

>>> s = 'abc'
>>> s[None:None]
'abc'

Better IMO to just have the one non-redundant method that raises an
exception rather than returning anything that could possibly be
interpreted as a string index.