Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #108293

Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter...

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Christopher Reimer <christopher_reimer@icloud.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter...
Date Sat, 07 May 2016 12:17:39 -0700
Lines 18
Message-ID <mailman.471.1462652269.32212.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <572BF2BF.6000000@icloud.com> <1462498631.232041.599637409.25D91C08@webmail.messagingengine.com> <572E3F53.5010703@icloud.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de klZET+KSR+lgOCjTUovDSw5aKOzrIAOaQ7tl7B+hoGTg==
Return-Path <christopher_reimer@icloud.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.056
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.00; 'reject': 0.05; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.07; 'thu,': 0.15; 'happy.': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "shouldn't": 0.18; 'first,': 0.20; 'stephen': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'subject:list': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'received:17': 0.27; 'correct': 0.28; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.30; '(i.e.,': 0.30; 'received:10.0.0': 0.32; 'options': 0.33; 'purposes,': 0.33; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'filter': 0.35; 'possible.': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'hiring': 0.37; 'thank': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'header:MIME- version:1': 0.60; 'default': 0.61; 'engine': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'hand': 0.82; '"yes,': 0.84; 'header :In-reply-to:1': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-05-07_12:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1510270003 definitions=main-1605070286
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
In-reply-to <1462498631.232041.599637409.25D91C08@webmail.messagingengine.com>
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=4d515a; t=1462648660; bh=Onm/5yWDskAGsS6o6O818+7Vte8uH4jOQ103/pPOHaA=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-id:Date:MIME-version:Content-type; b=cCLbgIMFtzqwQfJ+qHOONuOxOujAzbc7cMTd+boiwnlzq05/Ezfi+VaOJ3WMYmaEF n6prBw66RplubAU7qVtqMudHc9macDjtMSIahYgmWppLvfWd11e3fexPqJLfinFzos 7qqjOlYEyEeol8fDfj9nlxU6DLMTWAk1TDpk5/75OTdLKM9EG40ra+ss/6o038AFDw jQMOnT4DEUruUWjNGFIHl5MorBGwFUnaLAziaIFQCnNLPm9T6sI+O3595QjLtlMSzu VoLui4GEKohiaFcngRT8Q2KKlOBYZbF6UBe+DdOtBZitesyP3D/xWpuUJjJaFptofa RwSqZbtM6xGXg==
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <572E3F53.5010703@icloud.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <572BF2BF.6000000@icloud.com> <1462498631.232041.599637409.25D91C08@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:108293

Show key headers only | View raw


On 5/5/2016 6:37 PM, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016, at 06:26 PM, Christopher Reimer wrote:
>> Which is one is correct (Pythonic)? Or does it matter?
> First, pylint is somewhat opinionated, and its default options shouldn't
> be taken as gospel. There's no correct: filter is fine.

Since the code I'm working on is resume fodder (i.e., "Yes, I code in 
Python! Check out my chess engine code on GitHub!"), I want it to be as 
Pythonic and PEP8-compliant as possible. That includes scoring 10/10 
with pylint. Never know when an asshat hiring manager would reject my 
resume out of hand because my code fell short with pylint.

For my purposes, I'm using the list comprehension over filter to keep 
pylint happy.

Thank you,

Chris R.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Christopher Reimer <christopher_reimer@icloud.com> - 2016-05-07 12:17 -0700
  Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-05-07 23:31 +0300
    Re: Pylint prefers list comprehension over filter... Christopher Reimer <christopher_reimer@icloud.com> - 2016-05-07 14:36 -0700

csiph-web