Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #34237
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <thebalancepro@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.008 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'hettinger': 0.07; 'seemed': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '(it': 0.09; 'lines:': 0.09; 'string)': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.10; 'def': 0.10; 'itertools': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'meanwhile': 0.16; 'nick': 0.16; 'respondents': 0.16; 'thoughts?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'import': 0.21; '(all': 0.22; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; 'wednesday,': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'raymond': 0.23; 'split': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'tried': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.26; 'module.': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'lines': 0.28; 'along.': 0.29; 'behaving': 0.29; 'description,': 0.29; 'whitespace': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.29; 'case,': 0.29; 'words': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'e.g.': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'december': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.32; 'file': 0.32; 'url:listinfo': 0.32; '2007,': 0.33; 'null': 0.33; 'shorter': 0.33; 'anyone': 0.33; 'guys': 0.33; 'themselves': 0.33; 'hi,': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'text': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'fresh': 0.35; 'mine': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'skip:p 20': 0.36; 'turn': 0.36; 'best,': 0.37; 'does': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'drop': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'description': 0.39; 'space': 0.39; 'skip:" 10': 0.40; 'end': 0.40; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'red': 0.60; 'mentioned': 0.63; 'love': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'today,': 0.64; 'said:': 0.65; 'shortly': 0.65; 'hours': 0.66; 'url:bit': 0.66; 'url:ly': 0.66; 'account': 0.67; 'felt': 0.75; 'complex,': 0.84; 'words)': 0.84; 'heat': 0.91; 'subject:Good': 0.91 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2012 07:24:07 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <mailman.461.1354631511.29569.python-list@python.org> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.170.17.135; posting-account=ZAg6xAoAAAAmY8bBi3VzYjWntm8Ct1P8 |
| References | <b80f3ab3-ef81-4806-86db-efd5800d4bb3@googlegroups.com> <mailman.461.1354631511.29569.python-list@python.org> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-IP | 124.170.17.135 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Subject | Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile |
| From | Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> |
| To | comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.465.1354635214.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 185 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1354635214 news.xs4all.nl 6882 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37492 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:34237 |
Show key headers only | View raw
I love the way you guys can write a line of code that does the same as 20 of mine :)
I can turn up the heat on your regex by feeding it a null description or multiple white space (both in the original file.) I'm sure you'd adjust, but at the cost of a more complex regex.
Meanwhile takewith and dropwith are behaving themselves impeccably but my while loop has fallen over.
Best,
Nick
On Wednesday, 5 December 2012 01:31:48 UTC+11, Vlastimil Brom wrote:
> 2012/12/4 Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > I came across itertools.dropwhile only today, then shortly afterwards found Raymond Hettinger wondering, in 2007, whether to drop [sic] dropwhile and takewhile from the itertools module.
>
> >
>
> > Fate of itertools.dropwhile() and itertools.takewhile() - Python
>
> > bytes.com
>
> > http://bit.ly/Vi2PqP
>
> >
>
> > Almost nobody else of the 18 respondents seemed to be using them.
>
> >
>
> > And then 2 hours later, a use case came along. I think. Anyone have any better solutions?
>
> >
>
> > I have a file full of things like this:
>
> >
>
> > "CAPSICUM RED fresh from Queensland"
>
> >
>
> > Product names (all caps, at start of string) and descriptions (mixed case, to end of string) all muddled up in the same field. And I need to split them into two fields. Note that if the text had said:
>
> >
>
> > "CAPSICUM RED fresh from QLD"
>
> >
>
> > I would want QLD in the description, not shunted forwards and put in the product name. So (uncontrived) list comprehensions and regex's are out.
>
> >
>
> > I want to split the above into:
>
> >
>
> > ("CAPSICUM RED", "fresh from QLD")
>
> >
>
> > Enter dropwhile and takewhile. 6 lines later:
>
> >
>
> > from itertools import takewhile, dropwhile
>
> > def split_product_itertools(s):
>
> > words = s.split()
>
> > allcaps = lambda word: word == word.upper()
>
> > product, description = takewhile(allcaps, words), dropwhile(allcaps, words)
>
> > return " ".join(product), " ".join(description)
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > When I tried to refactor this code to use while or for loops, I couldn't find any way that felt shorter or more pythonic:
>
> >
>
> > (9 lines: using for)
>
> >
>
> > def split_product_1(s):
>
> > words = s.split()
>
> > product = []
>
> > for word in words:
>
> > if word == word.upper():
>
> > product.append(word)
>
> > else:
>
> > break
>
> > return " ".join(product), " ".join(words[len(product):])
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > (12 lines: using while)
>
> >
>
> > def split_product_2(s):
>
> > words = s.split()
>
> > i = 0
>
> > product = []
>
> > while 1:
>
> > word = words[i]
>
> > if word == word.upper():
>
> > product.append(word)
>
> > i += 1
>
> > else:
>
> > break
>
> > return " ".join(product), " ".join(words[i:])
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Any thoughts?
>
> >
>
> > Nick
>
> > --
>
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> the regex approach doesn't actually seem to be very complex, given the
>
> mentioned specification, e.g.
>
>
>
> >>> import re
>
> >>> re.findall(r"(?m)^([A-Z\s]+) (.+)$", "CAPSICUM RED fresh from QLD\nCAPSICUM RED fresh from Queensland")
>
> [('CAPSICUM RED', 'fresh from QLD'), ('CAPSICUM RED', 'fresh from Queensland')]
>
> >>>
>
>
>
> (It might be necessary to account for some punctuation, whitespace etc. too.)
>
>
>
> hth,
>
> vbr
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 05:57 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-04 14:23 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 06:47 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-04 15:17 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 15:31 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 07:24 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 22:08 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 07:24 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-04 18:26 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Alexander Blinne <news@blinne.net> - 2012-12-04 18:18 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile DJC <djc@news.invalid> - 2012-12-04 18:28 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Alexander Blinne <news@blinne.net> - 2012-12-04 19:48 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 12:37 -0700
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Alexander Blinne <news@blinne.net> - 2012-12-04 21:33 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-12-04 21:13 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-04 20:17 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-04 15:44 -0500
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 17:17 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 00:45 +1100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-05 14:34 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-12-05 08:33 -0700
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-05 16:11 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-12-05 15:32 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-12-05 09:16 -0700
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-05 17:57 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-04 17:17 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-05 13:29 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-05 09:04 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-05 17:57 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-05 18:16 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Nick Mellor <thebalancepro@gmail.com> - 2012-12-05 11:01 -0800
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-05 20:13 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2012-12-05 22:36 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-12-06 13:06 +0000
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Vlastimil Brom <vlastimil.brom@gmail.com> - 2012-12-06 15:12 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Alexander Blinne <news@blinne.net> - 2012-12-06 14:40 +0100
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-04 17:21 -0500
Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-12-06 13:29 -0800
csiph-web