Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.028
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.95; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.07; 'unicode,': 0.09; 'thread': 0.11; 'sat,': 0.15; 'subject:String': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'byte': 0.17; 'unicode': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'handling': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'correct': 0.28; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; '12,': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'between': 0.63; '2013': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=KdpLE5mnyfZ4czaEtg4rV/w3w/38MrPEctT2o1cqQCE=; b=SWOrhtm+jUcSVoAb8HLBV/Fi5zJBRLSvzFkk2kKYcXjL4xYNy1VjFs+Lm0QJDA5QgN qjA5xCDAo2teLzfrUuDG3xMNx3bd98nfGxdphBMv38KNMx713rs/XZIKxGbWPvChl9Hi zFS+g2ez2Ws1wHj/mgF0OnmmokBuN44rJkA/UNbojuG4oMqMMbI/QUQW8Ubwg3uqaq1E DtJSIzIWz9PeRtyohgfd/ter0BpEfeiz/jb9slT+9O/ihLkcVsNyFHoBGKWzxd5Ou19n tgatxfwG3iqlGiucOH4HjlTmBK4qCDbzR1UwtZ569uf05Utwf6L9w42ff3EhldVorkJc Y8Hw==
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<bec9b22e-b366-4505-be70-a745b5fbe0a7@googlegroups.com>
References	<kcpnmj$jpu$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.412.1357935875.2939.python-list@python.org> <kcpu0l$qdu$1@dont-email.me> <bec9b22e-b366-4505-be70-a745b5fbe0a7@googlegroups.com>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:34:12 -0700
Subject	Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness
To	Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.453.1358012085.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	5
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1358012085 news.xs4all.nl 6845 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44876
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:36711

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:38 AM,  <wxjmfauth@gmail.com> wrote:
> The difference between a correct (coherent) unicode handling and ...

This thread was about byte string concatenation, not unicode, so your
rant is not even on-topic here.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-01-11 19:03 +0000
  Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 13:16 -0700
    Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-01-11 20:51 +0000
      Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-01-12 00:38 -0800
        Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-01-12 06:31 -0500
        Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-01-12 10:34 -0700

csiph-web