Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness

References	<kcpnmj$jpu$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.412.1357935875.2939.python-list@python.org> <kcpu0l$qdu$1@dont-email.me> <bec9b22e-b366-4505-be70-a745b5fbe0a7@googlegroups.com>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	2013-01-12 10:34 -0700
Subject	Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.453.1358012085.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:38 AM,  <wxjmfauth@gmail.com> wrote:
> The difference between a correct (coherent) unicode handling and ...

This thread was about byte string concatenation, not unicode, so your
rant is not even on-topic here.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-01-11 19:03 +0000
  Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 13:16 -0700
    Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2013-01-11 20:51 +0000
      Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2013-01-12 00:38 -0800
        Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-01-12 06:31 -0500
        Re: String concatenation benchmarking weirdness Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-01-12 10:34 -0700

csiph-web