Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49989
| References | <b3ne2rFojnkU1@mid.dfncis.de> <b3nmtfFojnkU3@mid.dfncis.de> <b3o3gkFtc39U1@mid.dfncis.de> |
|---|---|
| From | Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2013-07-05 15:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: How to make this faster |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4299.1373035554.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 5 July 2013 15:28, Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:41:23 +0100, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>
>> On 5 July 2013 11:53, Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>>> I even tried to use dictionaries instead of Numpy arrays. This version is a bit
>>> slower then the lists of lists version (7.2 seconds instead of 6 second) but still
>>> much faster than the Numpy array solution.
>>
>> When you switched to dictionaries did you take advantage of the
>> sparseness by iterating over dictionary keys instead of indices? This
>> is the kind of thing that I meant when I said that in Python it's
>> often easier to implement a better algorithm than in C. What I mean is
>> that if Grid is a dict so that Grid[(r, c)] is the entry at row r and
>> column c (if it exists) then you can change a loop like:
>>
>> for r in range(9):
>> for c in range(9):
>> if Grid[r, c] > 0: continue
>> # do stuff
>>
>> so that it looks like:
>>
>> for r, c in Grid:
>> # do stuff
>>
>> If the grid is sparsely occupied then this could be a significant improvement.
>>
> This gives a big speedup. Now, the time is gone down to 1.73 seconds in comparison to
> original 13 seconds or the 7 seconds for the first version above.
Presumably then you're now down to the innermost loop as a bottle-neck:
Possibilities= 0
for d in range(1,10) :
if Row_Digits[r,d] or Col_Digits[c,d] or Sqr_Digits[Sq_No,d] : continue
Possibilities+= 1
If you make it so that e.g. Row_Digits[r] is a set of indices rather
than a list of bools then you can do this with something like
Possibilities = len(Row_Digits[r] | Col_Digits[c] | Sqr_Digits[Sq_No])
or perhaps
Possibilities = len(set.union(Row_Digits[r], Col_Digits[c],
Sqr_Digits[Sq_No]))
which I would expect to be a little faster than looping over range
since the loop is then performed under the hood by the builtin
set-type.
> Many thanks,
> it seems hard to optimize a Python program,
It just takes practice. It's a little less obvious in Python than in
low-level languages where the bottlenecks will be and which operations
are faster/slower but optimisation always involves a certain amount of
trial and error anyway.
Oscar
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 08:22 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 10:38 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 10:07 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 11:13 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 10:53 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-05 12:02 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 13:44 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 14:41 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 14:28 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 15:45 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 14:48 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 16:26 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 14:54 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 16:18 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-05 16:24 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 15:17 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-05 16:38 +0100
Re: How to make this faster MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-07-05 17:25 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-07-06 02:45 +0100
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 15:47 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-05 16:52 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 16:07 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-05 16:50 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 18:39 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-07-06 03:05 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-06 07:25 +0000
Re: How to make this faster Helmut Jarausch <jarausch@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> - 2013-07-05 18:42 +0000
csiph-web