Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #62073
| From | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: min max from tuples in list |
| Date | 2013-12-16 10:59 -0500 |
| References | (4 earlier) <c1a6930f-13ba-4e84-a35d-e50f1c00f50f@googlegroups.com> <60cce71c-dad2-4a7b-a5d0-daa45a6b0e28@googlegroups.com> <mailman.4102.1386981019.18130.python-list@python.org> <i59qa91d3dj5eqj743nfkombkged69lvo4@4ax.com> <d1f0cda2-28c9-47ab-9d79-0edc9c136e50@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4220.1387209564.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 12/16/13 10:49 AM, rusi wrote: > On Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:11:15 AM UTC+5:30, Tim Roberts wrote: >> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >>>> Well "performant" is performant enough for the purposes of communicating >>>> on the python list I think :D >>> Most probably could figure it out as being stylistically similar to >>> conformant => something that conforms >>> performant => something that performs > >> Yes, I suspect it comes from people expecting too much consistency. If >> something that has "conformance" is "conformant", then something that has >> good "performance" must be "performant". > > And things that have consistency are of course... > > consistant > > (not consistent) > In English, it's spelled consistent: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consistant -- Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
min max from tuples in list Robert Voigtländer <r.voigtlaender@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 23:25 -0800
Re: min max from tuples in list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 19:18 +1100
Re: min max from tuples in list Robert Voigtländer <r.voigtlaender@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 00:34 -0800
Re: min max from tuples in list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 19:43 +1100
Re: min max from tuples in list Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-12-12 09:35 +0100
Re: min max from tuples in list Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2013-12-12 10:52 +0200
Re: min max from tuples in list Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-12-12 10:03 +0100
Re: min max from tuples in list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-12 11:44 +0000
Re: min max from tuples in list Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-12-12 06:04 -0600
Re: min max from tuples in list MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-12-12 12:36 +0000
Re: min max from tuples in list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-12 23:25 +0000
Re: min max from tuples in list Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-12-12 13:54 +0100
Re: min max from tuples in list Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-13 02:36 +0000
Re: min max from tuples in list Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-12 10:02 -0500
Re: min max from tuples in list Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-12 15:13 +0000
Re: min max from tuples in list Robert Voigtländer <r.voigtlaender@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 22:28 -0800
Re: min max from tuples in list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 10:06 -0800
Re: min max from tuples in list Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-12-13 19:30 -0500
Re: min max from tuples in list Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2013-12-14 19:41 -0800
Re: min max from tuples in list Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 23:08 +1100
Re: min max from tuples in list rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 07:49 -0800
Re: min max from tuples in list Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-16 10:59 -0500
Re: min max from tuples in list Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-17 11:49 +1300
Re: min max from tuples in list Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-13 01:33 +0000
csiph-web