Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'consistency': 0.09; 'english,': 0.09; 'performs': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'spelled': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '10:49': 0.16; 'consistency.': 0.16; 'expecting': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(not': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; '15,': 0.26; 'purposes': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'tim': 0.29; 'subject:list': 0.30; 'url:wiki': 0.31; '>>>>': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'figure': 0.32; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'december': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'similar': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'most': 0.60; 'course...': 0.84; 'rusi': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Ned Batchelder Subject: Re: min max from tuples in list Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:59:07 -0500 References: <52a9a1a0$0$29992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <60cce71c-dad2-4a7b-a5d0-daa45a6b0e28@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 18.189.43.80 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1387209564 news.xs4all.nl 2913 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34196 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:62073 On 12/16/13 10:49 AM, rusi wrote: > On Sunday, December 15, 2013 9:11:15 AM UTC+5:30, Tim Roberts wrote: >> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >>>> Well "performant" is performant enough for the purposes of communicating >>>> on the python list I think :D >>> Most probably could figure it out as being stylistically similar to >>> conformant => something that conforms >>> performant => something that performs > >> Yes, I suspect it comes from people expecting too much consistency. If >> something that has "conformance" is "conformant", then something that has >> good "performance" must be "performant". > > And things that have consistency are of course... > > consistant > > (not consistent) > In English, it's spelled consistent: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consistant -- Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com