Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #90495

Re: Suggestion: PEP for tracking vulnerable packages within PyPI

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'pypi': 0.07; 'subject:PEP': 0.07; 'dependency': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:PyPI': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'language.': 0.14; 'pulling': 0.16; 'reasonably': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'suggestion.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'community.': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'are.': 0.31; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'plans': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'hi,': 0.36; 'feedback': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'track': 0.38; 'ability': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'release': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'extended': 0.61; "you've": 0.63; 'information': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'forward': 0.65; 'great': 0.65; 'management': 0.65; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'within': 0.65; 'worth': 0.66; 'minutes': 0.67; 'apart': 0.72; 'capability': 0.84; 'thing,': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Suggestion: PEP for tracking vulnerable packages within PyPI
Date Tue, 12 May 2015 22:17:29 +0100
References <CAHXGaxD+hj=N-UqzO=nepka0KJ7zbr+_VneuPRbs34G6NjZNZA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-78-147-185-107.as13285.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
In-Reply-To <CAHXGaxD+hj=N-UqzO=nepka0KJ7zbr+_VneuPRbs34G6NjZNZA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.419.1431465458.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 35
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1431465458 news.xs4all.nl 2892 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36129
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:90495

Show key headers only | View raw


On 12/05/2015 20:46, Grant Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When pulling in a dependency via pip it is currently difficult to reason about
> whether there are any vulnerabilities associated with the package version you
> are using. I think the Python package management infrastructure could be
> extended to facilitate this capability reasonably easily. PyPI already
> contains a lot of metadata around package owners and releases available.
> Adding the ability to flag a release as having a vulnerability and CVE
> associated with it seems like a reasonable addition to me.
>
> Currently there are some projects that are trying to track this information [1],
> however by including this type of information as a part of the main Python
> infrastructure I think it would encourage better vulnerability management
> practices within the community.
>
> I'd like some feedback on how to move forward with this suggestion. Does
> this seem like something that could be worth turning into a PEP?
>
> 1. https://github.com/victims/victims-cve-db
>
> - Grant
>

It strikes me as a great idea.  As you've got the time to send three 
emails some 40 minutes apart saying the same thing, you must have the 
time to do the work that is involved, so please let us know what your 
plans are.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Suggestion: PEP for tracking vulnerable packages within PyPI Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-12 22:17 +0100

csiph-web