Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #90495 > unrolled thread

Re: Suggestion: PEP for tracking vulnerable packages within PyPI

Started byMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
First post2015-05-12 22:17 +0100
Last post2015-05-12 22:17 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Suggestion: PEP for tracking vulnerable packages within PyPI Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-12 22:17 +0100

#90495 — Re: Suggestion: PEP for tracking vulnerable packages within PyPI

FromMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2015-05-12 22:17 +0100
SubjectRe: Suggestion: PEP for tracking vulnerable packages within PyPI
Message-ID<mailman.419.1431465458.12865.python-list@python.org>
On 12/05/2015 20:46, Grant Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When pulling in a dependency via pip it is currently difficult to reason about
> whether there are any vulnerabilities associated with the package version you
> are using. I think the Python package management infrastructure could be
> extended to facilitate this capability reasonably easily. PyPI already
> contains a lot of metadata around package owners and releases available.
> Adding the ability to flag a release as having a vulnerability and CVE
> associated with it seems like a reasonable addition to me.
>
> Currently there are some projects that are trying to track this information [1],
> however by including this type of information as a part of the main Python
> infrastructure I think it would encourage better vulnerability management
> practices within the community.
>
> I'd like some feedback on how to move forward with this suggestion. Does
> this seem like something that could be worth turning into a PEP?
>
> 1. https://github.com/victims/victims-cve-db
>
> - Grant
>

It strikes me as a great idea.  As you've got the time to send three 
emails some 40 minutes apart saying the same thing, you must have the 
time to do the work that is involved, so please let us know what your 
plans are.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web