Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61972
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <cameron@cskk.homeip.net> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.010 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'plenty': 0.07; 'subject:file': 0.07; 'permissions': 0.09; 'used.': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'thread': 0.14; '(low': 0.16; '.txt': 0.16; 'disc': 0.16; 'flush': 0.16; 'from:addr:cs': 0.16; 'from:addr:zip.com.au': 0.16; 'from:name:cameron simpson': 0.16; 'message-id:@cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:211.29': 0.16; 'received:211.29.132': 0.16; 'received:cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:optusnet.com.au': 0.16; 'received:syd.optusnet.com.au': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'sqlite': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'files.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'commit': 0.19; 'mechanism': 0.19; 'things.': 0.19; 'load': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'aspect': 0.24; 'config': 0.24; 'lets': 0.24; 'cheers,': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; "i've": 0.25; 'mention': 0.26; 'switch': 0.26; 'subject:/': 0.26; 'asking': 0.27; 'required.': 0.27; 'gets': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'wondering': 0.29; 'tim': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'chase': 0.31; 'forces': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'checked': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'open': 0.33; 'except': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'accessing': 0.36; 'disk': 0.36; 'received:com.au': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'level': 0.37; 'received:211': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'files': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'extremely': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'back': 0.62; 'content-disposition:inline': 0.62; "you'll": 0.62; 'making': 0.63; 'places': 0.64; 'subject:more': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; 'situation': 0.65; 'benefit': 0.68; 'atomic': 0.84; 'configparser': 0.84; 'drank': 0.84; 'nfs': 0.84; 'safe.': 0.84; 'subject:read': 0.84; 'plain-text': 0.91; 'shares': 0.93 |
| Date | Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:12:28 +1100 |
| From | Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Subject | Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| In-Reply-To | <20131214101518.69b040dc@bigbox.christie.dr> |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
| References | <20131214101518.69b040dc@bigbox.christie.dr> |
| X-Optus-CM-Score | 0 |
| X-Optus-CM-Analysis | v=2.1 cv=YYGEuWhf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=YuQlxtEQCowy2cfE5kc7TA==:117 a=YuQlxtEQCowy2cfE5kc7TA==:17 a=ZtCCktOnAAAA:8 a=PO7r1zJSAAAA:8 a=LcaDllckn3IA:10 a=AcBfY2YtO3UA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=vrnE16BAAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=pQ66fiTqrssA:10 a=8uR6FKqcAAAA:8 a=MPK07nUipAtBmWzLU_0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4156.1387150700.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 53 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1387150700 news.xs4all.nl 2953 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46479 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:61972 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 14Dec2013 10:15, Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> wrote:
> On 2013-12-14 07:29, JL wrote:
> > I have a number of python processes which communicate with each
> > other through writing/reading config text files. The python
> > ConfigParser is used. I am wondering if it is more CPU-efficient to
> > switch to using sqlite database instead of using configuration
> > files. If the software does plenty of reading/writing, is it more
> > efficient to use config text files or sqlite database?
>
> I'm pretty sure that the CPU aspect doesn't really play into things.
> A few thoughts:
>
> + You'll be I/O bound most of the time. Even if you used a ramdisk
> to reduce disk access delays, accessing multiple .txt files requires
> the OS to do permission-checking each time, while a single sqlite
> file gets checked once upon opening the DB initially.
> + text-files are fragile unless you take extra pains to keep things
> atomic
> + sqlite guarantee* atomicity, so you either see all-or-nothing
> + sqlite is also very efficient for querying
Annoyingly, sqlite:
+ only lets one process access the db at a time, taking you back to
a similar situation as with config files
+ only lets you access the db from the same thread in which it
was opened, outstandingly annoying; I've had to gratuitously
refactor code because of this
+ traditionally, sqlite is extreme fsync() happy; forces a disc
level flush on each commit - extremely slow on busy databases,
not to mention hard of drives
> + sticking with plain-text config files is just asking for some sort
> of race-condition or partial-file issue to come up
A locking mechanism will be required. Lockfiles work quite well.
> + sqlite may give you less CPU load is just an added benefit
>
> * well, except on NFS shares and other places where file-locking is
> unreliable
Backing off to config files, making a lock directory is NFS safe.
So is opening a lock file for write with zero permissions (low level
open with mode=0).
Cheers,
--
Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
I drank what?!? - Socrates
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-12-16 10:12 +1100
csiph-web