Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61973
| References | <20131214101518.69b040dc@bigbox.christie.dr> <20131215231228.GA6608@cskk.homeip.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-16 10:50 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4157.1387151420.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: > + traditionally, sqlite is extreme fsync() happy; forces a disc > level flush on each commit - extremely slow on busy databases, > not to mention hard of drives I'd say that's correct behaviour. A commit should be sync'd to disk. If you don't want it to go to the disk yet, don't commit yet! ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is it more CPU-efficient to read/write config file or read/write sqlite database? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-16 10:50 +1100
csiph-web