Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42400
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <bjruth@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'programmer': 0.03; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'responding': 0.07; 'statically': 0.07; 'assumed': 0.09; 'attributes': 0.09; 'implemented.': 0.09; 'method,': 0.09; 'methods,': 0.09; 'rejected': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'bug': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; '@property': 0.16; 'a()': 0.16; 'a(object):': 0.16; 'backwards': 0.16; 'byron': 0.16; 'callable': 0.16; 'collections': 0.16; 'competent': 0.16; 'conforming': 0.16; 'downstream': 0.16; 'incorrect': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'iterator,': 0.16; 'justified': 0.16; 'likely.': 0.16; 'programmer,': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'renamed': 0.16; 'ruth': 0.16; 'subject:skip:_ 10': 0.16; 'typeerror:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'properly': 0.19; '(the': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; '31,': 0.24; 'errors.': 0.24; 'skip:` 20': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'defined': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'url:bugs': 0.29; '(this': 0.29; 'raymond': 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; 'accidentally': 0.31; 'assumes': 0.31; 'behaving': 0.31; 'comparison': 0.31; 'concern': 0.31; 'existence': 0.31; 'libraries': 0.31; 'subject:next': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'checked': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; '(i.e.': 0.33; 'alone': 0.33; 'checking': 0.33; 'implemented': 0.33; 'not.': 0.33; '"the': 0.34; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'possible.': 0.35; 'problem.': 0.35; 'definition': 0.35; "who's": 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'next': 0.36; 'method': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'example,': 0.37; 'requirements': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'feedback': 0.38; 'initially': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'realize': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'march': 0.61; 'complete': 0.62; 'more': 0.64; 'determine': 0.67; 'realized': 0.68; 'saw': 0.77; 'behavior': 0.77; 'hardly': 0.84; 'investigated': 0.84; 'subject:check': 0.84; 'technically': 0.84; 'url:master': 0.84; 'worthwhile.': 0.84; 'time)': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 |
| X-Received | by 10.49.116.165 with SMTP id jx5mr638725qeb.22.1364759895579; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:58:15 -0700 (PDT) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Date | Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:58:15 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <mailman.4025.1364759240.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.78.73.157; posting-account=nhAoTgoAAAAiTaZekt1AoJpN1Rr2agdx |
| References | <a108caf6-538b-4ca0-978a-97bacc7ca7e8@googlegroups.com> <mailman.4025.1364759240.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-IP | 65.78.73.157 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Subject | Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable |
| From | Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> |
| To | comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4026.1364759904.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 147 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1364759904 news.xs4all.nl 6841 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55621 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:42400 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Thanks for responding Terry. I can assure you I did not initially realize both the `next` and the `__iter__` methods were implemented when I ran into my original problem. I saw a behavior and had to work backwards to realize why it was behaving the way it was (the comparison against Iterator). Once I realized this, the behavior made complete sense. It just dawned on me the fact that `next` was not being checked to be callable (I was surprised by this at the time) which is why I investigated the `Iterator.__subclasshook__` and assumed it was behaving incorrectly based on my assumptions. On Sunday, March 31, 2013 3:47:07 PM UTC-4, Terry Jan Reedy wrote: > On 3/31/2013 1:57 PM, Byron Ruth wrote: > > > I submitted this as bug last night: http://bugs.python.org/issue17584 and was *honored* to be rejected by Raymond Hettinger. However, I would like feedback on whether my concern (this bug) is justified and clarity if not. > > > > > > Consider: > > > > > > ```python > > > class A(object): > > > def __init__(self): > > > self.r = iter(range(5)) > > > def __iter__(self): > > > return self > > > @property > > > def next(self): > > > return next(self.r) > > > ``` > > > > > > The `next` method is a property, however: > > > > A competent Python programmer should not do that. In Py3, the method is > > properly renamed '__next__', which should make doing that accidentally > > even less likely. > > > > > > > > ```python > > > from collections import Iterator > > > a = A() > > > isinstance(a, Iterator) # True > > > next(a) # TypeError: 'int' object is not callable > > > ``` > > > > > > I am using `collections.Iterator` as the means to check if the object is an iterator, > > > > Being an Iterator only means that it *might* be an iterator. > > > > > however I am not sure if that is _root_ problem here. My > > understanding of the iterator protocol is that is assumes the __iter__ > > and next *methods* are implemented. In the example, `A.next` is defined > > as a property, but is still identified as an iterator. To me, this is > > incorrect behavior since it's not conforming to the iterator protocol > > requirements (i.e. a `next` method, not a property). > > > > There is more to any protocol than can be statically checked. > > > > > Raymond stated: "The design of ABCs are to check for the existence to required named; none of them verify the signature." > > > > Having the required attributes is currently the definition of being an > > instance of an ABC. Adding 'not a property' would be possible. but > > hardly worthwhile. Checking signatures would be worthwhile, but > > signatures are not yet available to Python for C-coded methods, let > > alone other implementations. > > > > I think I understand _why_ this is the case.. but I downstream > > libraries use `collections.Iterator` to determine if an object _is one_: > > see > > https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/utils/itercompat.py#L22-L31 > > > > > > Who's job is it to check if `next` (and technically `__iter__`) are methods? > > > > The programmer, and a user who does not trust the competence of the > > programmer. But this is the least of the possible errors. > > > > -- > > Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 10:57 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 12:44 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-31 15:47 -0400
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 12:58 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 12:58 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-03-31 17:02 -0700
csiph-web