Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #42400
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-31 12:58 -0700 |
| References | <a108caf6-538b-4ca0-978a-97bacc7ca7e8@googlegroups.com> <mailman.4025.1364759240.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| Subject | Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable |
| From | Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4026.1364759904.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Thanks for responding Terry. I can assure you I did not initially realize both the `next` and the `__iter__` methods were implemented when I ran into my original problem. I saw a behavior and had to work backwards to realize why it was behaving the way it was (the comparison against Iterator). Once I realized this, the behavior made complete sense. It just dawned on me the fact that `next` was not being checked to be callable (I was surprised by this at the time) which is why I investigated the `Iterator.__subclasshook__` and assumed it was behaving incorrectly based on my assumptions. On Sunday, March 31, 2013 3:47:07 PM UTC-4, Terry Jan Reedy wrote: > On 3/31/2013 1:57 PM, Byron Ruth wrote: > > > I submitted this as bug last night: http://bugs.python.org/issue17584 and was *honored* to be rejected by Raymond Hettinger. However, I would like feedback on whether my concern (this bug) is justified and clarity if not. > > > > > > Consider: > > > > > > ```python > > > class A(object): > > > def __init__(self): > > > self.r = iter(range(5)) > > > def __iter__(self): > > > return self > > > @property > > > def next(self): > > > return next(self.r) > > > ``` > > > > > > The `next` method is a property, however: > > > > A competent Python programmer should not do that. In Py3, the method is > > properly renamed '__next__', which should make doing that accidentally > > even less likely. > > > > > > > > ```python > > > from collections import Iterator > > > a = A() > > > isinstance(a, Iterator) # True > > > next(a) # TypeError: 'int' object is not callable > > > ``` > > > > > > I am using `collections.Iterator` as the means to check if the object is an iterator, > > > > Being an Iterator only means that it *might* be an iterator. > > > > > however I am not sure if that is _root_ problem here. My > > understanding of the iterator protocol is that is assumes the __iter__ > > and next *methods* are implemented. In the example, `A.next` is defined > > as a property, but is still identified as an iterator. To me, this is > > incorrect behavior since it's not conforming to the iterator protocol > > requirements (i.e. a `next` method, not a property). > > > > There is more to any protocol than can be statically checked. > > > > > Raymond stated: "The design of ABCs are to check for the existence to required named; none of them verify the signature." > > > > Having the required attributes is currently the definition of being an > > instance of an ABC. Adding 'not a property' would be possible. but > > hardly worthwhile. Checking signatures would be worthwhile, but > > signatures are not yet available to Python for C-coded methods, let > > alone other implementations. > > > > I think I understand _why_ this is the case.. but I downstream > > libraries use `collections.Iterator` to determine if an object _is one_: > > see > > https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/utils/itercompat.py#L22-L31 > > > > > > Who's job is it to check if `next` (and technically `__iter__`) are methods? > > > > The programmer, and a user who does not trust the competence of the > > programmer. But this is the least of the possible errors. > > > > -- > > Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 10:57 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 12:44 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-03-31 15:47 -0400
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 12:58 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Byron Ruth <bjruth@gmail.com> - 2013-03-31 12:58 -0700
Re: collections.Iterator __subclasshook__ does not check if next() is callable Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-03-31 17:02 -0700
csiph-web