Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #61664

Re: Trouble with Multi-threading

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

If you really want to have a discussion on multi-threading, then look at
quantum bits/computers, and let's see where python can go from the real
future of prototyping language, to the expert in it.



On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, December 12, 2013 7:30:38 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> > In article Steven D'Aprano  wrote:
>
> > > When did this forum become so intolerant of even the tiniest, most
> minor
> > > breaches of old-school tech etiquette? Have we really got nothing
> better
> > > to do than to go on the war path over such trivial issues? Out of five
> > > responses to the Original Poster's email, there was *one* helpful
> reply,
> > > followed by no fewer than four people playing "Stacks on the n00b"
> making
> > > the same comment about being unable to delete the message. I'm sure all
> > > four of you think you are ever such wits, but you're only half right.
>
> > I believe I started off the chain of responses you're referring to.  I
> > meant it semi-humorously, but also with a point.  It is clear it turned
> > out to be harmful, and for that I apologize.
>
> Sniping at someone -- especially a newcomer -- for a piece of technical
> irrelevantia is unfortunate. However your semi-humorous pointing out
> was good because it shows that all posting methods have their hiccups:
>
> html mail
> undesired and nonsensical footers
> reply/reply-all mixups
> repeated posts
> long and double-spaced lines
> others Ive missed
>
> Reminds me that sometime ago when GG was habitually double-posting,
> Steven started quadruple-posting, giving some of us a rare leg-pulling
> opportunity :D
>
> > I share your dismay at where this group is going, and feel bad that I
> > inadvertently moved it further in that direction.
>
> Unnecessary and uncalled for irascibility is of course a degradation.
>
> But (from my pov) a bunch of people -- especially so-called techies --
> unable to distinguish the following 3 is a much bigger degradation.
>
> 1 Problems caused by conscious malefic intent
> 2 Kids/noobs/ignoramuses/immature just being themselves
> 3 Problems of communication technology
>
> Conflating 1,3 with 2 will drive many of them (2s) away which is a
> significant loss for the community
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>



-- 
Best Regards,
David Hutto
*CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com <http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com>*

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Trouble with Multi-threading dan.rose@parker.com - 2013-12-10 11:21 -0500
  Re: Trouble with Multi-threading Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-10 11:51 -0500
  Re: Trouble with Multi-threading Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2013-12-10 17:57 +0000
    Re: Trouble with Multi-threading Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-11 10:37 +0000
      Re: Trouble with Multi-threading Steve Simmons <square.steve@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 12:25 +0100
      Re: Trouble with Multi-threading Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-11 21:00 -0500
        Re: Trouble with Multi-threading rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 20:26 -0800
          Re: Trouble with Multi-threading David Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2013-12-12 00:39 -0500
        Re: Trouble with Multi-threading Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-12 10:48 +0000
  Re: Trouble with Multi-threading feedthetroll@gmx.de - 2013-12-10 11:43 -0800
  Re: Trouble with Multi-threading Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-11 10:50 +0000

csiph-web