Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #98925
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Nicolas Évrard <nicoe@altern.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance |
| Date | Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:27:39 -0300 |
| Lines | 26 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.388.1447770859.16136.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de 3yGZRwxPUrvcMVqc/l7OYASs2kt36rXNAPm45scwcDQQ== |
| Return-Path | <nicoe@altern.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.061 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'hettinger': 0.07; 'tuple.': 0.09; '+32': 0.16; 'hashes': 0.16; 'nicolas': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:type': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'url:status': 0.18; 'proposed': 0.20; 'arrays': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'wrote': 0.23; 'this:': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'tend': 0.27; 'sets.': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'raymond': 0.30; 'realize': 0.32; 'list': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'structures': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'received:localhost.localdomain': 0.38; 'received:localdomain': 0.38; 'data': 0.39; 'rather': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'hello,': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'tel:': 0.65; 'website:': 0.65; 'received:190': 0.70; 'received:94.23': 0.72; 'saw': 0.77; 'message-id:@localhost.localdomain': 0.79; 'morning:': 0.84; 'utmost': 0.84; 'choice.': 0.93; 'colleague': 0.93 |
| Mail-Followup-To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-OS | GNU/Linux |
| User-Agent | Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:98925 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello,
I saw the following retweet by Raymond Hettinger in this morning:
https://twitter.com/sanityinc/status/666485814214287360
Programming tip: many of those arrays and hashes in your code
should actually be sets. Match data structures to data
constraints!
I saw just in time because in a review I wrote something like this:
if operator not in ('where', 'not where')
and my colleague proposed that I should use a list instead of a tuple.
But reading the mentioned tweet I tend to think that a set would be a
better choice.
What are your opinion on this issue (I realize it's not something of
the utmost importance but rather a "philosophical" question).
--
Nicolas Évrard - B2CK SPRL
E-mail/Jabber: nicolas.evrard@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Nicolas Évrard <nicoe@altern.org> - 2015-11-17 11:27 -0300
Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-18 22:37 +1100
Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 23:40 +1100
Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-19 00:30 +1100
Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2015-11-18 13:32 +0000
Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 00:42 +1100
csiph-web