Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #98963

Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance

From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance
Date 2015-11-18 23:40 +1100
Message-ID <mailman.411.1447850412.16136.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <mailman.388.1447770859.16136.python-list@python.org> <564c62f3$0$1593$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
> How about Python 3? Python 3 has the advantage of using set literals.

2.7 has set literals too. All the questions of performance should be
secondary to code clarity, though; so I would say the choices are: Set
literal if available, else tuple. Forget the performance.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Nicolas Évrard <nicoe@altern.org> - 2015-11-17 11:27 -0300
  Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-18 22:37 +1100
    Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 23:40 +1100
      Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-11-19 00:30 +1100
        Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2015-11-18 13:32 +0000
        Re: Which type should be used when testing static structure appartenance Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 00:42 +1100

csiph-web