Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #52248
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" |
| Date | 2013-08-09 08:31 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <215331fa-379f-4251-b722-44555349fbb5@googlegroups.com> <ktvl3d$vr9$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.343.1375951856.1251.python-list@python.org> <3b1f6c61-da0b-42bd-acf5-95962f6d33d9@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.387.1376029907.1251.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
adam.preble@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:50:47 AM UTC-5, Peter Otten wrote:
>> Peter Otten wrote:
>> Oops, that's an odd class name. Fixing the name clash in Types.__new__()
>> is
>>
>> left as an exercise...
>
> Interesting, I got __main__.T, even though I pretty much just tried your
> code wholesale.
I see I have to fix it myself then...
> For what it's worth, I'm using Python 2.7. I'm glad to
> see that code since I learned a lot of tricks from it.
[My buggy code]
> class Type(type):
> def __new__(class_, name, bases, classdict):
Here 'name' is the class name
> newclassdict = {}
> for name, attr in classdict.items():
> if getattr(attr, "test", False):
> assert not name.startswith(PREFIX)
> name = PREFIX + name
> assert name not in newclassdict
> newclassdict[name] = attr
Here 'name' is the the last key of classdict which is passed to type.__new__
instead of the actual class name.
> return type.__new__(class_, name, bases, newclassdict)
[Fixed version]
class Type(type):
def __new__(class_, classname, bases, classdict):
newclassdict = {}
for name, attr in classdict.items():
if getattr(attr, "test", False):
assert not name.startswith(PREFIX)
name = PREFIX + name
assert name not in newclassdict
newclassdict[name] = attr
return type.__new__(class_, classname, bases, newclassdict)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-07 23:32 -0700
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-08 04:04 -0400
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-08 09:20 -0700
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-08 15:28 -0400
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-08-08 10:32 +0200
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-08-08 10:50 +0200
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-08 09:17 -0700
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-08-08 13:14 -0400
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-08-09 08:31 +0200
Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-11 21:25 -0700
csiph-web