Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #52175

Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?"

From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?"
Date 2013-08-08 04:04 -0400
References <215331fa-379f-4251-b722-44555349fbb5@googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.341.1375949083.1251.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/8/2013 2:32 AM, adam.preble@gmail.com wrote:
> We were coming into Python's unittest module from backgrounds in nunit, where they use a decorate to identify tests.  So I was hoping to avoid the convention of prepending "test" to the TestClass methods that are to be actually run.  I'm sure this comes up all the time, but I mean not to have to do:
>
> class Test(unittest.TestCase):
>      def testBlablabla(self):
>          self.assertEqual(True, True)
>
> But instead:
> class Test(unittest.TestCase):
>      @test
>      def Blablabla(self):
>          self.assertEqual(True, True)

I cannot help but note that this is *more* typing. But anyhow, something 
like this might work.

def test(f):
     f.__class__.__dict__['test_'+f.__name__]

might work. Or maybe for the body just
    setattr(f.__class__, 'test_'+f.__name__)


> Superficially, you'd think changing a function's __name__ should do the trick, but it looks like test discovery happens without looking at the transformed function.

I am guessing that unittest discovery for each class is something like

if isinstance (cls, unittest.TestCase):
   for name, f in cls.__dict__.items():
     if name.startswith('test'):
       yield f

You were thinking it would be
...
   for f in cls.__dict__.values():
     if f.__name__.startwith('test'):
       yield f

Not ridiculous, but you seem to have disproven it. I believe you can 
take 'name' in the docs to be bound or namespace name rather than 
definition or attribute name.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-07 23:32 -0700
  Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-08 04:04 -0400
    Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-08 09:20 -0700
      Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-08 15:28 -0400
  Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-08-08 10:32 +0200
  Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-08-08 10:50 +0200
    Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-08 09:17 -0700
      Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-08-08 13:14 -0400
    Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-08 22:07 -0700
      Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-08-09 08:31 +0200
        Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" adam.preble@gmail.com - 2013-08-11 21:25 -0700

csiph-web