Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #27875

Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???)

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <mail@timgolden.me.uk>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'pop': 0.05; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.07; 'nntp': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'aug': 0.13; '24,': 0.16; 'from:addr:timgolden.me.uk': 0.16; 'from:name:tim golden': 0.16; 'message-id:@timgolden.me.uk': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'subject:Filter': 0.16; 'subject:versus': 0.16; 'threads': 0.16; 'tjg': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'replacing': 0.17; 'skip': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'appears': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.20; 'produces': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; "haven't": 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'lines': 0.28; '(since': 0.29; 'contrast,': 0.29; 'occasional': 0.29; 'quoting': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'fri,': 0.30; 'text': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'subject: (': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.39; 'google': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'times': 0.63; 'from:addr:mail': 0.71; 'average.': 0.84; 'hypothesis': 0.84; 'dennis': 0.91; 'outgoing': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.93
Date Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:31:08 +0100
From Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version 1.0
CC python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???)
References <CAExgZOh=_Mr0WR4ypXV70s9MUbDHbeppyAq=Nn2yy2NCsws7jQ@mail.gmail.com> <502A865E.4030504@sequans.com> <CAExgZOiHi-mE1mVvxYOST5RDbosDn3fP1X2nxkyDiKk=0ajjSw@mail.gmail.com> <CADYZVBCZZ3cAHGDe=wyi62Hg9+qU_r2U8F+85gHEOzs0Ekv1BA@mail.gmail.com> <k11ro8$cer$1@ger.gmane.org> <k121ob$lp9$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.3665.1345653816.4697.python-list@python.org> <960e4798-745b-4e9b-aedb-14aae986d086@googlegroups.com> <k188ns$or7$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.3764.1345832961.4697.python-list@python.org> <k18j6n$k6h$1@news.albasani.net> <CAF3Xjbzogci6xJ7H5sC-inWxfhkTE3oRo49TkTsb=QX3YOVCQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To <CAF3Xjbzogci6xJ7H5sC-inWxfhkTE3oRo49TkTsb=QX3YOVCQw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3804.1345908679.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 24
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1345908679 news.xs4all.nl 6977 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60355
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:27875

Show key headers only | View raw

On 25/08/2012 13:57, David Robinow wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:29:00 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>>
>>> It appears to be a change Google made in the last month or two... My
>>> hypothesis is that they are replacing hard EOL found in inbound NNTP
>>> with an HTML <p>, and then on outgoing replacing the <p> with a pair of
>>> NNTP line endings. In contrast, text composed on Google is coming in as
>>> long single lines (since quoting said text in a response produces on a
>>> ">" at the start of the paragraph.
>>
>> Google Groups sucks. These are computer literate people here. Why don't
>> they just use a proper newsreader?
> I haven't used a newsreader in over a decade. I'm quite happy with a
> mailing list. Am I missing something?

Not really. I'm the same; it just means you can skip over the occasional 
ggroups-newsreader discussion threads which pop up
about 3 times a year on average.

:)

TJG

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-22 12:43 -0400
  Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:44 -0700
    Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-24 12:04 -0400
    Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-24 14:29 -0400
      Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2012-08-24 19:03 +0000
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-24 17:56 -0400
          Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2012-08-24 22:55 +0000
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-24 18:03 -0400
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-24 15:15 -0700
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-24 23:28 +0100
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2012-08-24 15:36 -0700
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2012-08-24 15:39 -0700
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 08:57 -0400
        Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-08-25 16:31 +0100
  Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:44 -0700

csiph-web