Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #27875
| Date | 2012-08-25 16:31 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
| Subject | Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) |
| References | (7 earlier) <960e4798-745b-4e9b-aedb-14aae986d086@googlegroups.com> <k188ns$or7$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.3764.1345832961.4697.python-list@python.org> <k18j6n$k6h$1@news.albasani.net> <CAF3Xjbzogci6xJ7H5sC-inWxfhkTE3oRo49TkTsb=QX3YOVCQw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3804.1345908679.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 25/08/2012 13:57, David Robinow wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:29:00 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >> >>> It appears to be a change Google made in the last month or two... My >>> hypothesis is that they are replacing hard EOL found in inbound NNTP >>> with an HTML <p>, and then on outgoing replacing the <p> with a pair of >>> NNTP line endings. In contrast, text composed on Google is coming in as >>> long single lines (since quoting said text in a response produces on a >>> ">" at the start of the paragraph. >> >> Google Groups sucks. These are computer literate people here. Why don't >> they just use a proper newsreader? > I haven't used a newsreader in over a decade. I'm quite happy with a > mailing list. Am I missing something? Not really. I'm the same; it just means you can skip over the occasional ggroups-newsreader discussion threads which pop up about 3 times a year on average. :) TJG
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-22 12:43 -0400
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:44 -0700
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-24 12:04 -0400
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-24 14:29 -0400
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2012-08-24 19:03 +0000
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-24 17:56 -0400
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Walter Hurry <walterhurry@lavabit.com> - 2012-08-24 22:55 +0000
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-08-24 18:03 -0400
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-24 15:15 -0700
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-24 23:28 +0100
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2012-08-24 15:36 -0700
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2012-08-24 15:39 -0700
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) David Robinow <drobinow@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 08:57 -0400
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-08-25 16:31 +0100
Re: Filter versus comprehension (was Re: something about split()???) Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:44 -0700
csiph-web