Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #106325

Re: Drowning in a teacup?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Drowning in a teacup?
Date Sat, 02 Apr 2016 16:15:53 -0700
Lines 26
Message-ID <mailman.379.1459638921.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <ndmlj2$pb0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a2445859-f1ff-42cf-88ca-4004517b6624@googlegroups.com> <1459626868.1382635.566734322.250BAE2A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de 3Ij9XF2BF/pooiAiAmE8hwhOWyLXMKu3OK6ald8w0iUA==
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'assignment': 0.07; 'friday,': 0.07; 'caller.': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'mutable': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'value.': 0.15; '"value"': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'confusion': 0.16; 'languages)': 0.16; 'proceeding': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'pointed': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; 'pass': 0.22; 'sat,': 0.23; 'properties': 0.24; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'order.': 0.27; 'used,': 0.27; 'function': 0.28; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'holds': 0.32; 'statement': 0.32; 'point': 0.33; 'false': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'show': 0.62; 'here.': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'matter': 0.63; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'utc-4,': 0.84; 'notorious': 0.91; 'have.': 0.93
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
In-Reply-To <1459626868.1382635.566734322.250BAE2A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:106325

Show key headers only | View raw

On 04/02/2016 12:54 PM, Random832 wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 15:28, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>> On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 4:27:30 PM UTC-4, Fillmore wrote:
>>> notorious pass by reference vs pass by value biting me in the backside
>>> here. Proceeding in order.
>>
>> As others have pointed out, this is false dichotomy.  There are other
>> possibilities than pass by reference and pass by value.  Python (and
>> many other languages) use something called pass by object or pass by
>> sharing.
>
> I think that this arises from a confusion as to what a "value" is in
> "pass by value".
>
> The point of it being pass by value is that there is no statement you
> can execute in the function that has the effect of an assignment of the
> expression that was passed in from the caller. This holds no matter what
> kind of object is passed in or what mutable properties it has or does
> not have.

Also, if "pass-by-value" is being used, even mutation of the passed 
object will not show up in the caller.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Drowning in a teacup? Fillmore <fillmore_remove@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:27 -0400
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-04-01 20:39 +0000
    Re: Drowning in a teacup? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 14:52 -0600
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-04-01 21:45 +0100
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-02 09:46 +1100
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Fillmore <fillmore_remove@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-02 00:03 -0400
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 07:45 +0200
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 05:51 +0000
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 08:26 +0200
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-04-02 12:31 +0200
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-02 12:53 +0100
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 14:36 +0000
  Re: Drowning in a teacup? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-04-02 12:28 -0700
    Re: Drowning in a teacup? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-02 15:54 -0400
      Re: Drowning in a teacup? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-04-03 12:33 +1000
    Re: Drowning in a teacup? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-04-02 16:15 -0700
    Re: Drowning in a teacup? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-02 19:19 -0400

csiph-web