Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49095
| References | <8D03F2B8CF0E7BE-1864-1796B@webmail-m103.sysops.aol.com> <CAPTjJmrwNyF2-J8F3ii8W4WpkrNC67+i88ODLyiqHGa_7bz0Xg@mail.gmail.com> <20130624173050.5e16debf@bigbox.christie.dr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 23:39 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile |
| From | Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3776.1372113570.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 24 Jun 2013 23:35, "Tim Chase" <python.list@tim.thechases.com> wrote: > > On 2013-06-25 07:38, Chris Angelico wrote: > > Python has no issues with breaking out of loops, and even has > > syntax specifically to complement it (the 'else:' clause). Use > > break/continue when appropriate. > > from minor_gripes import breaking_out_of_nested_loops_to_top_level > > -tkc > for x, y in itertools.product(range(width), range(height)):
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-24 23:39 +0100
csiph-web