Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49094
| References | <8D03F2B8CF0E7BE-1864-1796B@webmail-m103.sysops.aol.com> <CAPTjJmrwNyF2-J8F3ii8W4WpkrNC67+i88ODLyiqHGa_7bz0Xg@mail.gmail.com> <20130624173050.5e16debf@bigbox.christie.dr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-25 08:35 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3775.1372113364.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> wrote: > On 2013-06-25 07:38, Chris Angelico wrote: >> Python has no issues with breaking out of loops, and even has >> syntax specifically to complement it (the 'else:' clause). Use >> break/continue when appropriate. > > from minor_gripes import breaking_out_of_nested_loops_to_top_level True. There are times I do wish for a 'goto'. But if goto were implemented, I would also use it for jumping _into_ loops, and I'm not sure that's going to make the feature popular :) ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is this PEP-able? fwhile Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 08:35 +1000
csiph-web