Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.041 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:help': 0.08; '*is*': 0.09; 'classes.': 0.09; 'interpreted': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; "'bout": 0.16; '(it': 0.16; 'subject:object': 0.16; 'to:name:python list': 0.16; 'obviously': 0.18; 'basically': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; '(like': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'argue': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'yes.': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'says': 0.33; 'subject:the': 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; "didn't": 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'realize': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'most': 0.60; "you've": 0.63; 'bottom': 0.67; 'default': 0.69; 'subject:base': 0.84; 'washington': 0.93; 'mr.': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4GNh2ANBjCTyxFMoq4E9YNAS8Q2xA8jhaGnsqQ8g6jI=; b=WKDnTZ2+FctJXTwmFYie4nhVoywj8DXIlGxor7f43H0GOPm8sr8ho+1+hgLZ6+fMss PF4UfQwLg6K4GzQ6YEnJ5ATlwxooZDY85F1LLeRohvbcQUZHBZmn3Ccl2wVk4Yotxnrm NbQqo78WOUkiqbo7nxAV8Xj5GXgrsxWsYAvWodohWj/I9CqxFC8VDp7RvZZnbbbnnO1T 8hJ0cb7dpppoFqiiRQ2ZjEbsu+KskraKy10hd7CClJhN04XUpqM89tKDoRsVxtijW2VQ knbU8I2Tlryyi/CiqkV9vZZi0yGF4pCwX7BtrB8ONFLKS0ZYAxSi7HZfuOTZ65NpAfXW 2N+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.211.71 with SMTP id na7mr8695751wic.5.1386476466356; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 20:21:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 20:21:06 -0800 Subject: Re: interactive help on the base object From: Mark Janssen To: Python List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 24 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1386476467 news.xs4all.nl 2830 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52074 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:61270 >>> Is it just me, or is this basically useless? >>> >>> class object >>> | The most *base* type >> [[Terry Reedy:]] > How about something like. > The default top *superclass* for all Python classes. How 'bout you foos just admit that you didn't realize you've been confused this whole time? (It *is* possible isn't it?) Mr. Ewing says "base" has to be interpreted as an *adjective* because otherwise it would mean the BOTTOM (like the BASE of the pyramid), while Terry responds that it is the TOP (*super*class). Earlier, Steven D'Aprano wanted to argue that this distinction was irrelevant, but obviously it can't very well be both at once now cannit? Could-the-world-be-so-crazy-confused-and-then-shoot-the-messenger? Sadly, yes. MarkJ Tacoma, Washington