Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #27721
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.04; 'exception.': 0.07; 'suppose': 0.07; 'try:': 0.07; 'called.': 0.09; 'defined.': 0.09; 'exception:': 0.09; 'function:': 0.09; 'here?': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'possible?': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip.t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'subject:arithmetic': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'define': 0.20; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'prints': 0.29; 'evaluation': 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'could': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'like:': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'except': 0.36; 'passed': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'chance': 0.61; 'therefore': 0.65; '666': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> |
| Subject | Re: Guarding arithmetic |
| Date | Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:11:21 +0200 |
| Organization | None |
| References | <8b9a5844-66b0-4940-946a-5e626462cdce@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | p50848ff6.dip.t-dialin.net |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.7.3 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3707.1345716686.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 30 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1345716686 news.xs4all.nl 6955 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57811 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:27721 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Mark Carter wrote: > Suppose I want to define a function "safe", which returns the argument > passed if there is no error, and 42 if there is one. So the setup is > something like: > > def safe(x): > # WHAT WOULD DEFINE HERE? > > print safe(666) # prints 666 > print safe(1/0) # prints 42 > > I don't see how such a function could be defined. Is it possible? 1/0 is evaluated before safe() is called. Therefore safe() has no chance to catch the exception. You have to move the evaluation into the safe() function: >>> def safe(deferred, default=42, exception=Exception): ... try: ... return deferred() ... except exception: ... return default ... >>> print safe(lambda: 666) 666 >>> print safe(lambda: 1/0) 42
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:05 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:16 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:29 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:22 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:23 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Carter <alt.mcarter@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 02:47 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 11:28 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 19:30 +1000
Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 12:11 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-08-23 10:15 -0700
Re: Guarding arithmetic Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> - 2012-08-23 13:01 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-08-23 12:21 +0100
Re: Guarding arithmetic Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-08-23 13:28 +0200
Re: Guarding arithmetic Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-08-23 15:11 +0100
Re: Guarding arithmetic Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-23 14:49 -0400
Re: Guarding arithmetic Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-08-24 07:48 +1000
csiph-web