Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #48784

Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.075
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.01; 'received:134': 0.05; 'subject:would': 0.07; 'lambda': 0.16; 'subject:key': 0.16; 'superfluous': 0.16; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; '>>>>': 0.31; 'subject:all': 0.32; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:x 10': 0.40; 'expression': 0.60; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'attention': 0.75; 'subject:Idea': 0.84
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result AqAIAAXdwlGGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABawyQEBAGBFYMYAQV4EQshFg8JAwIBAgEPNhMGAgKHeAMPsmoNS4gHjF2CbBaDSwOVWoFnhg6GEoUkgxE
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:45:27 +0200
From Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible?
References <9150d9b7-e488-4f9f-beff-4a140bcc78f0@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To <9150d9b7-e488-4f9f-beff-4a140bcc78f0@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3619.1371725131.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 11
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1371725131 news.xs4all.nl 15970 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53610
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:48784

Show key headers only | View raw

Op 19-06-13 18:14, russ.pobox@gmail.com schreef:
>
>>>> all(map(lambda x: bool(x), xrange(10**9)))

Since you already have your answer, I just like to get your attention
to the fact the the lambda is superfluous here. Your expression
above is equivallent to

  all(map(bool, xrange(10**9)))

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:14 -0700
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:20 +1000
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:32 -0700
    Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:39 +1000
      Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 03:05 -0700
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-06-20 12:45 +0200
    Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 07:49 -0700
      Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-21 01:48 +1000

csiph-web