Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #48784
| Date | 2013-06-20 12:45 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| Subject | Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? |
| References | <9150d9b7-e488-4f9f-beff-4a140bcc78f0@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3619.1371725131.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Op 19-06-13 18:14, russ.pobox@gmail.com schreef: > >>>> all(map(lambda x: bool(x), xrange(10**9))) Since you already have your answer, I just like to get your attention to the fact the the lambda is superfluous here. Your expression above is equivallent to all(map(bool, xrange(10**9)))
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:14 -0700
Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:20 +1000
Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:32 -0700
Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:39 +1000
Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 03:05 -0700
Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-06-20 12:45 +0200
Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 07:49 -0700
Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-21 01:48 +1000
csiph-web