Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43193

Re: standalone vs embedded interpreter

References <mailman.355.1365521615.3114.python-list@python.org> <da180e15-b4a9-4d5b-98da-86fd672aec6e@lp1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
Date 2013-04-10 02:14 +1000
Subject Re: standalone vs embedded interpreter
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.361.1365524048.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:52 AM, rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> wrote:
> You probably need readline
> See http://docs.python.org/2/library/cmd.html#cmd.Cmd.cmdloop
> [Also try Control-P COntrol-N for up and down arrow]

Be aware that GNU readline is GPL, not LGPL. This may have
consequences if you distribute your code.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

standalone vs embedded interpreter Nick Gnedin <ngnedin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 10:33 -0500
  Re: standalone vs embedded interpreter rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 08:52 -0700
    Re: standalone vs embedded interpreter Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 02:14 +1000

csiph-web