Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #43185
| Date | 2013-04-09 10:33 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Nick Gnedin <ngnedin@gmail.com> |
| Subject | standalone vs embedded interpreter |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.355.1365521615.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Folks,
When simply I embed the interpreter:
#include "Python.h"
int main()
{
Py_Initialize();
PyRun_InteractiveLoop(stdin,"test");
Py_Finalize();
return 0;
}
I expect it to behave the same way as if I was running it as a
standalone program. On Windows this is indeed the case, but on my Linux
box (Python 3.3.1 (default, Apr 8 2013, 22:33:31) [GCC 4.1.2 20080704
(Red Hat 4.1.2-51)]) I get a different behavior in handling console
input. A standalone interpreter cycles though the input history when I
use up and down arrows - say, I type this code:
>>> 1
1
>>> a=4
>>> a
4
If I now press an <up> key in a standalone interpreter, I get 'a' placed
at the prompt (my previous command). However, in an embedded code I get
>>> ^[[A
put at the prompt - does anyone know what I am doing wrong?
Many thanks for any hint,
Nick
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
standalone vs embedded interpreter Nick Gnedin <ngnedin@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 10:33 -0500
Re: standalone vs embedded interpreter rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 08:52 -0700
Re: standalone vs embedded interpreter Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 02:14 +1000
csiph-web