Re: Why is there no natural syntax for accessing attributes with names not being valid identifiers?

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'operator': 0.03; 'syntax': 0.04; 'attribute': 0.07; 'wednesday,': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; "'.'": 0.09; 'attributes': 0.09; 'classes.': 0.09; 'degree,': 0.09; 'identifier': 0.09; 'namespace': 0.09; 'obj': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'jan': 0.12; 'itself.': 0.14; 'changes': 0.15; 'backward': 0.16; 'declaration': 0.16; "module's": 0.16; 'namespace?': 0.16; 'piotr': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:accessing': 0.16; 'undesirable': 0.16; 'variable.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'pointed': 0.19; '(the': 0.22; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'preferred': 0.22; 'proposed': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'right.': 0.26; 'this:': 0.26; 'skip:_ 20': 0.27; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'thus': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'consequence': 0.31; 'workaround': 0.31; 'yes.': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'checked': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'skip:_ 10': 0.34; 'subject:with': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'created': 0.35; 'december': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'point.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'needed': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'major': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'received:173': 0.61; 'name': 0.63; 'refer': 0.63; 'great': 0.65; 'believe': 0.68; 'subject:there': 0.68; 'believe,': 0.84; 'keystrokes': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'subject:being': 0.84; 'ugly,': 0.84; '2013': 0.98
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: Why is there no natural syntax for accessing attributes with names not being valid identifiers?
Date	Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:21:06 -0500
References	<15912943-29a1-4365-b027-7bb8cec447f8@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3527.1386093834.18130.python-list@python.org> <eb15e1a8-49b1-4d55-a864-141efc65394e@googlegroups.com> <17gt99hg615jfm7bdid26185884d2pfdkf@4ax.com> <5eb566a0-3911-48fa-ba83-a863da66a55d@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3590.1386195130.18130.python-list@python.org> <451d174b-6620-476d-bf84-a76c6b1de87e@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	pool-173-75-254-207.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
In-Reply-To	<451d174b-6620-476d-bf84-a76c6b1de87e@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.3601.1386213683.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	58
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1386213683 news.xs4all.nl 2831 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51612
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:61074

Show key headers only | View raw

On 12/4/2013 6:42 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:11:56 PM UTC+1, Terry Reedy wrote:

>> The discussion of keystrokes is also a side-track.
>
> To great degree, yes. Having said that I find extra 11 keystrokes
> needed to access some attributes to be a freaking big and
> unjustifiable number.

Given that there is almost no need to ever use operator chars in 
attribute names and given that syntax changes have the major undesirable 
consequence of backward incompatibility, I find it to be a small and 
inconsequential number.

>> What you are proposing, I believe, is a new grammatical category:
>> attribute-name := identifier or string-literal. This would break
>> the symmetry of the grammatical form identifier '.' identifier and
>> change it to the asymmetrical identifier '.' attribute-name, and
>> that is the
>
> Nice description.
>
>> To put it another way, how does 'obj' get the non-standard
>> attribute 'value-1', when obj is a module or class? The workaround
>> given above for module attributes will not work for classes.

The module workaround, which I find pretty ugly, is this:

 >>> len is __builtins__.len
True
 >>> __globals__ = __import__(__name__)
 >>> a = 1
 >>> a is __globals__.a
True

I have not checked that the import trick will work when a module is 
imported, but I believe it will.

> I'm not sure I see your point. Do you mean that being inside class
> declaration there's no name that referrs to the current namespace
> (the way __globals__ refer to module's namespace) thus we can't use
> proposed syntax to access non-standard attributes from this
> namespace?

Right. Class objects are not created until after the class code runs.

>> Not really. As others have pointed out, getattr is the preferred
>> way to get the value of an attribute when you have an object with
>> attributes and a run-time-only reference to the name in a string
>> variable.
>
> Yes, and I think it's very unfortunate in itself.

Do you prefer obj.__dict__['name'] to getattr(obj, 'name')?

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Thread

csiph-web