Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible?

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.020
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.96; 'S': 0.00; 'python3': 0.07; 'subject:would': 0.07; 'feature,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'thread': 0.14; "wouldn't": 0.14; '(assuming': 0.16; 'angle': 0.16; 'bracket': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'quoted': 0.16; 'simplest': 0.16; 'subject:key': 0.16; 'thanks,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'import': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'effort.': 0.24; 'switch': 0.26; 'this:': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'getting': 0.31; 'clicked': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'subject:all': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'email addr:python.org': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'minimum': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'mailing': 0.39; 'skip:x 10': 0.40; "you're": 0.61; 'address': 0.63; 'email name :python-list': 0.65; 'reply': 0.66; '20,': 0.68; 'line,': 0.68; 'hey,': 0.75; 'citation': 0.84; 'one).': 0.84; 'subject:Idea': 0.84; 'reply,': 0.93; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qkmWvDKtsafWSNFvg2sC22SPErF7khdvrQd7+MmKjxI=; b=dxfPnibeH0jVNa4RJKiEARc1fX9H1tY4m36fSY2ELATu7PFCfY3OoHAT5uwBq58VKN AIvpm8GpgX3IpkM/MljxzLojx+vwPNAnH1OgW0oDYhPmMUs/g6bBkrwmoIX1P8AjQusd SorsqVlde6c58WRWY/J82RJLW3zV3O8vQmyw5h4PYyfP/vFtSVjGVOhF57taaoIEDV1y dehglNV21FoniNYlwiHeD6ZQADECmCsr6tL3TVzrT1VkKsSW9xI2Um72z7C4PQ1erSfD DcRwjRPE5zi4RDDb+4oKSE5IrWQ1gab5e958Yqj/24wO4vfItg4htcQvEjl9pHD3Davc UUbg==
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.52.163.165 with SMTP id yj5mr990037vdb.104.1371659970391; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<e536e8b0-c0ad-4a76-b17b-11f602f60338@googlegroups.com>
References	<9150d9b7-e488-4f9f-beff-4a140bcc78f0@googlegroups.com> <e536e8b0-c0ad-4a76-b17b-11f602f60338@googlegroups.com>
Date	Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:39:30 +1000
Subject	Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible?
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To	python-list@python.org
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.3586.1371659978.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	28
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1371659978 news.xs4all.nl 16001 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40797
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:48727

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:32 AM,  <russ.pobox@gmail.com> wrote:
>>All you need is the iterator version of map(). In Python 3, that's the
>>normal map(); in Python 2, use this:
>
>>>>> from itertools import imap
>>>>> all(imap(lambda x: bool(x), xrange(10**9)))
>>False
>
>>It's roughly instant, like you would expect.
>
>>ChrisA
>
> This probably isn't the way to post a reply on your own thread (I added an angle bracket to every line above :P) but last time clicked reply to author not knowing that is email. Anyways...

If you're getting this via the mailing list, just hit Reply, and then
change the To: address to python-list@python.org - that's the simplest
(assuming you don't have a Reply To List feature, but you wouldn't be
saying the above if you had one). That way, you get a citation line,
quoted text is marked, and it's taken a minimum of effort.

> Thanks, I like itertools but had no idea imap. Although I did suspect Python3 would have something to say about this just to make me envious :D
>
> It works like a charm!

Awesome! Hey, if you *can* switch to Py3, do try to. It has heaps of
improvements, and it has a future. :)

ChrisA

Thread

Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:14 -0700
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:20 +1000
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:32 -0700
    Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:39 +1000
      Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 03:05 -0700
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-06-20 12:45 +0200
    Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 07:49 -0700
      Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-21 01:48 +1000

csiph-web