Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #48724

Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.062
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.01; 'subject:would': 0.07; 'parameter': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'subject:key': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'this:': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '>>>>': 0.31; 'stuff': 0.32; 'subject:all': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'false': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:x 10': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'chance': 0.65; '20,': 0.68; 'instantly': 0.84; 'subject:Idea': 0.84; 'instant': 0.97; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ra1zTyUtGQqFR5McSlTzA2P3J00fs88qI1qu/4rLSEc=; b=oFzPjg0Nh2LFnGdrVkZVnfwAbS9T9xj63wtl6m9EV568VE323pcWIwrFBqOCf4UIbK l8sCVh6Dv4Hc5L3B8YSM/B5GJyf/HkvZ0z26OFzjbRks57tlF36T6rp3N6/V1ZiMvim3 RXbyArrbwi12rVbnxRwuV4hxzNGRruh603UIgdA4nIonT13/hY8qpf+wok+tgBaXMQun 9khhSWQHLxIS7IIqYxEX6qAZaaiegjyUxUXPmA+iOSUSgQrRLQ6f8GZZd7MRwbFtr1iB PX68rR0u7RU8M1A6T20J+kJxpzQ5F3YN518RU54omAHrm92F8FnGMsCZEcehiUqHQgSv M/Qw==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.220.182.193 with SMTP id cd1mr869951vcb.32.1371658829815; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <9150d9b7-e488-4f9f-beff-4a140bcc78f0@googlegroups.com>
References <9150d9b7-e488-4f9f-beff-4a140bcc78f0@googlegroups.com>
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:20:29 +1000
Subject Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible?
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To python-list@python.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3585.1371658839.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 21
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1371658839 news.xs4all.nl 15938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55483
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:48724

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:14 AM,  <russ.pobox@gmail.com> wrote:
> And the following, although the same thing really as all(xrange(10**9)), is not as instant and will take even longer than the above.
>
>>>> all(map(lambda x: bool(x), xrange(10**9)))
>
> However if all by some chance (I don't know how this stuff works underneath) has a key parameter then we could do something like.
>
>>>> all(xrange(10**9), key=lambda x: bool(x))
>
> Which would return False instantly (ideally).

All you need is the iterator version of map(). In Python 3, that's the
normal map(); in Python 2, use this:

>>> from itertools import imap
>>> all(imap(lambda x: bool(x), xrange(10**9)))
False

It's roughly instant, like you would expect.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:14 -0700
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:20 +1000
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? russ.pobox@gmail.com - 2013-06-19 09:32 -0700
    Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 02:39 +1000
      Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 03:05 -0700
  Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-06-20 12:45 +0200
    Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Russel Walker <russ.pobox@gmail.com> - 2013-06-20 07:49 -0700
      Re: Idea for key parameter in all() builting, would it be feasible? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-21 01:48 +1000

csiph-web