Re: Why is there no natural syntax for accessing attributes with names not being valid identifiers?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'syntax': 0.04; 'attribute': 0.07; 'reason,': 0.07; 'attributes': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'used.': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'identifier,': 0.16; 'identifiers': 0.16; 'identifiers,': 0.16; 'piotr': 0.16; 'rarely': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:accessing': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'code.': 0.18; 'variable': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "aren't": 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'along': 0.30; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'real': 0.63; 'needing': 0.65; 'skip:m 50': 0.68; 'subject:there': 0.68; 'literally.': 0.84; 'subject:being': 0.84; 'imagine': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
Subject	Re: Why is there no natural syntax for accessing attributes with names not being valid identifiers?
Date	Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:38:21 -0500
References	<15912943-29a1-4365-b027-7bb8cec447f8@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	18.189.126.187
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
In-Reply-To	<15912943-29a1-4365-b027-7bb8cec447f8@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.3523.1386092315.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	22
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1386092315 news.xs4all.nl 2976 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46687
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:60955

Show key headers only | View raw

On 12/3/13 12:14 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I find global getattr() function awkward when reading code.
> What is the reason there's no "natural" syntax allowing to access attributes with names not being valid Python identifiers in a similar way to other attributes?
> Something along the line of my_object.'valid-attribute-name-but-not-valid-identifier'?
>
>
> Regards,
> Piotr Dobrogost
>

I don't know the real reason, but I imagine it would be that it would be 
very rarely used.  It would need to be an attribute that isn't a valid 
identifier, and you know the attribute at the time you write the code.

I can see scenarios for needing attributes that aren't identifiers, but 
in many of them you also need to access them through a variable rather 
than literally.

--Ned.

Thread

csiph-web