Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #16976

Re: order independent hash?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'one?': 0.05; 'dict': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'relational': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'case.': 0.15; 'dbms': 0.16; 'subject:independent': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'ryan': 0.18; 'dec': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'items.': 0.23; 'unlikely': 0.23; 'pm,': 0.29; 'sun,': 0.30; 'tens': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'usually': 0.31; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'cases': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.34; 'all.': 0.34; 'implies': 0.34; 'lie': 0.34; 'received:au': 0.36; 'except': 0.37; 'using': 0.38; 'steven': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'processing': 0.39; 'should': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; '2011': 0.61; '11,': 0.68; 'database.': 0.74; 'received:110': 0.95
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com>
Subject Re: order independent hash?
Date Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:04:55 +1100
References <jb57p7$b1j$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.3156.1322657239.27778.python-list@python.org> <30715729.411.1322753732534.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pret21> <4ED7A2CE.6070306@davea.name> <mailman.3203.1322756312.27778.python-list@python.org> <6366868.86.1322800180523.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pret21> <mailman.3216.1322802013.27778.python-list@python.org> <87k46fb8pg.fsf@xemacs.org> <mailman.3239.1322862043.27778.python-list@python.org> <87aa78bfvv.fsf@xemacs.org> <CAPTjJmqrYLnhgCCDW3FdjOyqyUttW3cZu-=S1eW30217djgY8Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.3277.1323025080.27778.python-list@python.org> <87y5un9zs6.fsf@xemacs.org> <4ee1f093$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <jc0rnl$ham$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmrZQWFHA_jJN3eQWaH8VHx=GuiBVQN7hDqw7t0+8qonOA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 110-175-240-90.static.tpgi.com.au
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmrZQWFHA_jJN3eQWaH8VHx=GuiBVQN7hDqw7t0+8qonOA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.3507.1323572713.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 17
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1323572713 news.xs4all.nl 6890 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60382
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16976

Show key headers only | View raw

On 12/11/2011 11:17 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Lie Ryan<lie.1296@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 12/09/2011 10:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> Except for people who needed dicts with tens of millions of items.
>>
>> who should be using a proper DBMS in any case.
>
> Not necessarily. "Database" usually implies disk-based and relational,
> features that may well be quite superfluous; and a pure-memory
> database with no relational facilities... is basically a dict. So why
> not use one?

It is very unlikely you'd have millions of items in a dict and you're 
not planning to do any data processing at all. In any case, there are 
very few use cases which requires the use of a dict with millions of 
items that wouldn't be better served by a proper database.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: order independent hash? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-11-30 13:47 +0100
  Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 07:35 -0800
  Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 07:35 -0800
    Re: order independent hash? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2011-12-01 10:52 -0500
      Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 08:17 -0800
      Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 08:17 -0800
    Re: order independent hash? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 03:18 +1100
      Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 20:29 -0800
        Re: order independent hash? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-02 16:00 +1100
          Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 21:48 -0800
            Re: order independent hash? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 00:40 +1100
          Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 21:48 -0800
            Re: order independent hash? Roel Schroeven <rschroev_nospam_ml@fastmail.fm> - 2011-12-04 14:41 +0100
              Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-04 07:39 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-12-04 10:41 -0700
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-04 10:06 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-12-04 13:13 -0700
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-04 15:17 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Matt Joiner <anacrolix@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 10:21 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-12-04 16:24 -0700
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-04 16:52 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-05 02:00 +0000
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-04 16:52 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 12:59 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-12-04 18:08 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-12-05 15:52 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? Matt Joiner <anacrolix@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 14:02 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-06 21:24 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-06 21:24 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-04 15:17 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-04 19:28 -0500
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-04 10:06 -0800
          Re: order independent hash? Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2011-12-02 10:53 +0100
            Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-02 03:48 -0800
            Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-02 09:00 -0800
            Re: order independent hash? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-12-02 16:40 -0500
              Re: order independent hash? Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2011-12-04 14:55 +0100
                Re: order independent hash? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 01:08 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2011-12-07 14:28 +0100
                Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-07 09:48 -0800
                Re: order independent hash? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-12-04 12:57 -0600
                Re: order independent hash? Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2011-12-08 10:30 +0100
                Re: order independent hash? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-09 11:27 +0000
                Re: order independent hash? Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2011-12-09 17:51 +0100
                Re: order independent hash? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-10 04:13 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 10:58 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 11:17 +1100
                Re: order independent hash? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 14:04 +1100
        Re: order independent hash? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 00:29 +1100
      Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 20:29 -0800
      Re: order independent hash? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-12-02 04:33 +0000

csiph-web