Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #16652

Re: order independent hash?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.103
X-Spam-Level *
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.79; '*S*': 0.00; 'behave': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'reply-to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'accesses': 0.16; 'computation': 0.16; 'integers.': 0.16; 'subject:independent': 0.16; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'computing': 0.18; 'yet.': 0.18; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'table.': 0.23; 'cc:addr:gmail.com': 0.28; 'needed,': 0.28; 'sound': 0.28; 'elements': 0.29; 'mapping': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'hash': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; "i'll": 0.31; 'go.': 0.32; 'list': 0.32; 'sort': 0.33; "won't": 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'agree': 0.33; 'from:addr:googlemail.com': 0.34; 'too': 0.34; 'things': 0.34; 'operations': 0.35; 'cc:2**1': 0.36; 'members': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'list,': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'could': 0.37; 'bunch': 0.38; 'monday,': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'received:209': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'once': 0.60; 'range': 0.61; 'more': 0.61; '2011': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'life': 0.64; 'methods:': 0.67; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'reply-to:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.74; 'often,': 0.84; 'received:209.85.216.184': 0.84; 'received:mail- qy0-f184.google.com': 0.84; 'scatter': 0.84; 'fast,': 0.91; 'sum.': 0.91
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Mon, 5 Dec 2011 04:09:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <mailman.3287.1323064211.27778.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=1.168.138.227; posting-account=5JdMBQoAAABHnS4mjpqEzxnmWtgiiVNw
References <jb57p7$b1j$1@dough.gmane.org> <mailman.3287.1323064211.27778.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: order independent hash?
From 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com>
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com>, python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
Reply-To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.3297.1323086977.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 29
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1323086977 news.xs4all.nl 6973 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33960
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16652

Show key headers only | View raw


On Monday, December 5, 2011 1:50:08 PM UTC+8, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Two methods:
> 1) If you need your hash only once in an infrequent while, then save
> the elements in a list, appending as needed, and sort prior to
> hashing, as needed
> 
> 2) If you need your hash more often, you could keep your elements in a
> treap or red-black tree; these will maintain sortedness throughout the
> life of the datastructure.
> 
> 3) If A bunch of log(n) or n or nlog(n) operations doesn't sound
> appealing, then you might try this one: Create some sort of mapping
> from your elements to the integers.  Then just use a sum.  This won't
> scatter things nearly as well as a cryptographic hash, but it's very
> fast, because you don't need to reevaluate some of your members as you
> go.
> 
> HTH
> 
A sorted list can behave like a hash table.  This is of O(log(n)) in accesses 
of n items in theory. 

I agree with you a hash key computation method too slow than a list of n items  in accesses for a range of n items  should be reloadable.

But this is not supported in Python yet.  

For tedious trivial jobs of non-heavy computing , I'll opt for easy use. 
  

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: order independent hash? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-12-04 21:50 -0800
  Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-05 04:09 -0800
  Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-05 04:09 -0800
    Re: order independent hash? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 15:05 -0800

csiph-web