Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #16640
| References | <jb57p7$b1j$1@dough.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-04 21:50 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: order independent hash? |
| From | Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3287.1323064211.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Two methods: 1) If you need your hash only once in an infrequent while, then save the elements in a list, appending as needed, and sort prior to hashing, as needed 2) If you need your hash more often, you could keep your elements in a treap or red-black tree; these will maintain sortedness throughout the life of the datastructure. 3) If A bunch of log(n) or n or nlog(n) operations doesn't sound appealing, then you might try this one: Create some sort of mapping from your elements to the integers. Then just use a sum. This won't scatter things nearly as well as a cryptographic hash, but it's very fast, because you don't need to reevaluate some of your members as you go. HTH On 11/30/11, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@gmail.com> wrote: > I like to hash a list of words (actually, the command line args of my > program) > in such a way that different words will create different hash, but not > sensitive > to the order of the words. Any ideas? > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: order independent hash? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-12-04 21:50 -0800
Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-05 04:09 -0800
Re: order independent hash? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-05 04:09 -0800
Re: order independent hash? Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 15:05 -0800
csiph-web