Re: surprising += for lists

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'accepts': 0.09; 'logic': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; '7:45': 0.16; 'bugs.': 0.16; "guido's": 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'exists': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'operations.': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'wonder': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.28; 'implement': 0.32; 'subject:lists': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'clear': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'be.': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'list,': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'believe': 0.69; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'angel': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: surprising += for lists
Date	Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:57:11 -0500
References	<afn3i8Fn4j1U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <50966379.3070801@davea.name>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	pool-173-75-251-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
In-Reply-To	<50966379.3070801@davea.name>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.3260.1352051847.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	15
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1352051847 news.xs4all.nl 6983 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54201
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:32738

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/4/2012 7:45 AM, Dave Angel wrote:

> What I wonder about is why list's __add__  is so fussy.

Guido's reason is that it is not clear what the types of [1,2] + (3,4), 
(1,2) + [3,4], [] + range(4), range(2) + [3,4], etcetera should be. Such 
mixtures may be bugs. Seq.__add__ exists to implement '+'.

[].extend() will clearly be a list, and accepts any iterable.

I believe the same logic is used for set operations.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

surprising += for lists Ulrich Eckhardt <doomster@knuut.de> - 2012-11-04 12:57 +0100
  Re: surprising += for lists Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-11-04 23:06 +1100
  Re: surprising += for lists Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-11-04 07:45 -0500
  Re: surprising += for lists Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-11-04 12:57 -0500

csiph-web