Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #93098
| From | Randall Smith <randall@tnr.cc> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting |
| Date | 2015-06-24 14:00 -0500 |
| References | <mailman.10.1435130890.3674.python-list@python.org> <558a9649$0$1675$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.25.1435170024.3674.python-list@python.org> <mmesv6$8a8$3@reader1.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.32.1435172453.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 06/24/2015 01:29 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-06-24, Randall Smith <randall@tnr.cc> wrote: >> On 06/24/2015 06:36 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >>> I don't understand how mangling the data is supposed to protect the >>> recipient. Don't they have the ability unmangle the data, and thus >>> expose themselves to whatever nasties are in the files? >> >> They never look at the data and wouldn't care to unmangle it. > > I obviously don't "get it". If the recipient is never going look at > the data or unmangle it, why not convert every received file to a > single null byte? That way you save on disk space as well -- > especially if you just create links for all files after the initial > one. ;) > > [I supposed next you're going to tell me that Windows filesystems > don't support links.] > >> The purpose is primarily to prevent automated software (file >> indexers, virus scanners) from doing bad things to the data. > > Life under windows must be more tiresome than I imagined (or could > imagine) if you have to jump through such hoops to keep "automated > software" from doing bad things to your data files. > These are machines storing chunks of other people's data. The data owner chunks a file, compresses and encrypts it, then sends it to several storage servers. The storage server might be a Raspberry PI with a USB disk or a Windows XP machine - I can't know which. I don't use Windows and don't recommend it for this software. Nevertheless, many people do use it. -Randall
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Randall Smith <randall@tnr.cc> - 2015-06-23 14:02 -0500
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-06-24 21:36 +1000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-24 14:02 +0000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-06-24 08:52 -0700
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-24 16:16 +0000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 02:23 +1000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-24 18:23 +0000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-24 21:24 -0400
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 01:55 +1000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2015-06-24 09:09 -0700
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Randall Smith <randall@tnr.cc> - 2015-06-24 13:20 -0500
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-24 18:29 +0000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Randall Smith <randall@tnr.cc> - 2015-06-24 14:00 -0500
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-06-24 21:24 +0000
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Randall Smith <randall@tnr.cc> - 2015-06-24 18:13 -0500
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-24 21:33 -0400
Re: Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting Randall Smith <randall@tnr.cc> - 2015-06-25 14:41 -0500
csiph-web