Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #54062

Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <veritatem.ignotam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.033
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'say,': 0.05; 'suggest': 0.14; 'thread': 0.14; 'emacs,': 0.16; 'subject:user': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'code,': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'text,': 0.24; 'paul': 0.24; 'right.': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.31; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'next': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'tools,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'between': 0.67; 'subject:recommended': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4oUfzGrFhpax/KhIiRBT6vSgAfk0UKUWKZq2CUYu1n0=; b=M3f2nMr36yjU50ENb36Q1qIgNszJwm+pxo6YV0xsecnGWAjdXDE0M2jH2fPPOPYedF u2budJcYzO61hv92umYGRyCvH9S+coJwhXL3af1M/iXkCa6SvIakG9Q6HpRTOTuznWEZ 7mtdzRpIlUYNMeIwwacpGed42XVlc8QL+i3e+GWTrjwK3aVicLG+v8sqmzmD/8YjeVHY ViL2gXBgM8cBpH2h/pACtSoh8kSl2kCfK/fmIFqyCF4ehIRZewUyuzFoHRRnsnPIJ0u4 1OD1C1r/8Aq+E5lpMFDV7cRngL7W80nqNHOB8VqKIi2osik37Avb33eTt+6B5B0Pg6Tl gtpA==
X-Received by 10.43.19.198 with SMTP id ql6mr221850icb.22.1379001614139; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:00:11 -0400
From Veritatem Ignotam <veritatem.ignotam@gmail.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended?
References <091bbe36-8cf9-412f-b7e9-2b3cc89dd363@googlegroups.com> <7wppse2aak.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.301.1378969815.5461.python-list@python.org> <87vc26oxdd.fsf@no-fixed-abode.cable.virginmedia.net>
In-Reply-To <87vc26oxdd.fsf@no-fixed-abode.cable.virginmedia.net>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:10:24 +0200
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.315.1379002226.5461.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 17
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1379002226 news.xs4all.nl 15879 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54600
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:54062

Show key headers only | View raw

Is this thread going to evolve into your classic vim vs. emacs, sweet!

Also, Paul is completely right.

V.I.

On 09/12/2013 11:47 AM, Paul Rudin wrote:
> Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> writes:
>
>> If the time learning a set of tools is enough to make the choice
>> between tools, I suggest avoiding, say, Vim.
> That's a big if.
>
> If you expect to spend a lot of time editing text, code, etc. over the
> next few years then it's definitely learning at least one of vim or
> emacs to a reasonable degree of competency.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

better and user friendly IDE recommended? mnish1984@gmail.com - 2013-09-11 07:14 -0700
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@whitemice.org> - 2013-09-11 15:51 -0400
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-09-12 09:44 +1000
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-09-12 08:09 +0100
    Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2013-09-12 16:47 +0100
      Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Veritatem Ignotam <veritatem.ignotam@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 12:00 -0400
      Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Joe Junior <joe.fbs.junior@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 14:04 -0300
      Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-09-16 05:42 +0100
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-09-12 18:04 +1000
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> - 2013-09-12 11:02 +0100
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Paul Pittlerson <menkomigen6@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 03:55 -0700
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Fabio Zadrozny <fabiofz@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 09:12 -0300
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Wayne Werner <wayne@waynewerner.com> - 2013-09-12 09:22 -0500
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Westley Martínez <anikom15@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 10:23 -0700
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? Adrián Espinosa <mortuuslordofdeads@gmail.com> - 2013-09-12 14:15 -0700
    Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? memilanuk <memilanuk@gmail.com> - 2013-09-14 14:22 -0700
      Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? eric@invalid.com (EricF) - 2013-09-16 02:48 +0000
  Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-09-17 06:56 -0700

csiph-web